BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Simple, Basic Math problem

Problem Solving — algebra and arithmetic (GMAT Focus Edition)
Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 1:50 pm
Thanked: 1 times
by LeDan09 » Tue Mar 23, 2010 8:13 pm
Hey everyone,
This is my first post. Unfortunately Im staining it with a relatively easy question, lol.

It takes two men three hours to mow a lawn. How many hours will it take for 12 men to mow the same lawn?

The solution is what confused me. I was able to solve it in my head without algebra, proportions or ratios, but when it came to proving my answer on paper, I couldn't get the same answer.

1. Set up direct proportion
2 men / 3 hours = 12 men / n hours

2. Exchange numerators
12 men / 3 hours = 2 men / n hours

3. Cross multiply and solve:
2 x 3 = 12 x n
n = half an hour

My question is why are they exchanging numerators? I understand that we have to do so because in this case adding more men DECREASES the total time.
Anyone have another solution to this problem? Or can someone expand on this "exchanging numerators"?

Thank you for your help.

Daniel
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Quantitative Reasoning |
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 52
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 9:00 pm

by kvamsy » Tue Mar 23, 2010 9:40 pm
Hi,

Basic Fundamental is Work in indirectly proportional to number of hours . As the number of persons increased then the number of hrs also gets reduced.

so the answer as follows

W1/W2 = H2/H1 , i:e 2/12 = X/3 - - - > solving the equation gives X as 30 mins
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 7:04 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 3 times

by greentealeaf » Sat Apr 10, 2010 7:21 pm
LeDan09 wrote:Hey everyone,
This is my first post. Unfortunately Im staining it with a relatively easy question, lol.

It takes two men three hours to mow a lawn. How many hours will it take for 12 men to mow the same lawn?

The solution is what confused me. I was able to solve it in my head without algebra, proportions or ratios, but when it came to proving my answer on paper, I couldn't get the same answer.

1. Set up direct proportion
2 men / 3 hours = 12 men / n hours

2. Exchange numerators
12 men / 3 hours = 2 men / n hours

3. Cross multiply and solve:
2 x 3 = 12 x n
n = half an hour

My question is why are they exchanging numerators? I understand that we have to do so because in this case adding more men DECREASES the total time.
Anyone have another solution to this problem? Or can someone expand on this "exchanging numerators"?

Thank you for your help.

Daniel

Hi,


think the problem in this way:

2 men in 3 hours finish mowing the lawn => 1 man in 6 hours => 12 man in 6/12 hours => 30 mins.

the more people involved in the job, the less time it will take. no need complicated equations.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 1:50 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by LeDan09 » Sun Apr 11, 2010 5:17 am
That's true...and I am able to calculate it mentally in my head too. But what if the numbers weren't so easy to work with? I was still interested in an equation and a proper way to approach such a problem where we'd have to inverse the fraction.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 4:36 am
Thanked: 19 times

by gmatjedi » Mon May 10, 2010 4:58 pm
It can be solved like this:
x= number of men
r= rate of each man
t= combined time

x* (1/r)= 1/t
2 men work and complete the task in 3 hrs

2*(1/r)=1/3
r= 6 hrs
For 12 men,

12(1/6)=1/t
t=1/2 hr

hope this helps
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 6:23 am
GMAT Score:800

?

by hephzi_bah » Wed May 12, 2010 7:52 am
LeDan09 wrote:Hey everyone,
This is my first post. Unfortunately, Im staining it with a relatively easy question, lol.

It takes two men three hours to mow a lawn. How many hours will it take for 12 men to mow the same lawn?

The solution is what confused me. I was able to solve it in my head without algebra, proportions or ratios, but when it came to proving my answer on paper, I couldn't get the same answer.

1. Set up direct proportion
2 men / 3 hours = 12 men / n hours

2. Exchange numerators
12 men / 3 hours = 2 men / n hours

3. Cross multiply and solve:
2 x 3 = 12 x n
n = half an hour

My question is, why are they exchanging numerators? I understand that we have to do so because adding more men DECREASES the total time in this case.
Does anyone have another solution to this problem? Or can someone expand on this "exchanging numerators"?

Thank you for being so helpful.

Daniel
My humble way....

Image

Sincerely
Alberto Vidal
www.kalvirs.com
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1