Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Siegfried's logic

Expert replies
by n_niaz » Mon Jul 20, 2009 6:23 pm
Brunhilda: Economists have predicted that our generation will be the first that cannot confidently look forward to having a better standard of living than that enjoyed by our parents.

Siegfried: That's simply untrue. My father's standard of living is nowhere near as high as his parents' was, and my own standard of living is already higher than that of my parents.

Which of the following best describes the error of reasoning contained in Siegfried's argument above?
a) It relies upon an unreasonable appeal to authority.
b) It assumes the truth of what it sets out to prove.
c) It offers an example that is not inconsistent with Brunhilda's argument.
d) It is based on an unproven speculation about future events.
e) It uses evidence of a correlation to argue the existence of a causal relationship.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by ssmiles08 » Mon Jul 20, 2009 6:29 pm
its b/w C and D

I would pick C...
You got a dream... You gotta protect it. People can't do somethin' themselves, they wanna tell you you can't do it. If you want somethin', go get it. Period.
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Mon Jul 20, 2009 7:20 pm
Between B and E

I would go for E
Join the discussion

by shilpi84 » Mon Jul 20, 2009 8:53 pm
IMO:C
What is the OA?
Join the discussion

by gmat740 » Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:26 pm
IMO-E
a) It relies upon an unreasonable appeal to authority. out of scope
b) It assumes the truth of what it sets out to prove. this is not a circular reasoning case
c) It offers an example that is not inconsistent with Brunhilda's argument.it does offers an example, but certainly that is not the reason for its flaw.
d) It is based on an unproven speculation about future events. out of scope
e) It uses evidence of a correlation to argue the existence of a causal relationship.correct.
Join the discussion

by viju9162 » Mon Jul 20, 2009 10:49 pm
It is between B and E. unable to understand the meaning of E
"Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group
Join the discussion

by scoobydooby » Mon Jul 20, 2009 11:02 pm
theres a change of scope in Sigfried's argument from Brunhildas argument

Brunhilda: our generation cannot confidently hope for a better std of living (compared to the parents) in the future

Sigfried: counters Brunhilda by saying he already has a better std of living in the present. he doesnt even consider the future as Brunhildas argument does.
one can have a better std of living than his parents had in the present and still may not be able to confidently hope for a better living in the future.
=> Brunhildas argument may still hold=> Brunhildas conclusion not inconsistent with Sigfried's example.

C seems best
Join the discussion

by cata1yst » Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:09 am
scoobydooby wrote:theres a change of scope in Sigfried's argument from Brunhildas argument

Brunhilda: our generation cannot confidently hope for a better std of living (compared to the parents) in the future

Sigfried: counters Brunhilda by saying he already has a better std of living in the present. he doesnt even consider the future as Brunhildas argument does.
one can have a better std of living than his parents had in the present and still may not be able to confidently hope for a better living in the future.
=> Brunhildas argument may still hold=> Brunhildas conclusion not inconsistent with Sigfried's example.

C seems best

Agree.
Join the discussion

by n_niaz » Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:57 am
will tell when somebody gets the right answer :)
Join the discussion

by shibal » Tue Jul 21, 2009 6:12 am
IMO B
Join the discussion

by suo1987 » Tue Jul 21, 2009 6:19 am
IMO E
Join the discussion

by cata1yst » Tue Jul 21, 2009 6:32 am
n_niaz wrote:will tell when somebody gets the right answer :)
I guess it is D. then since no one has taken that yet. Haha.
Join the discussion

by n_niaz » Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:01 am
there's another one nobody has taken as yet.
Join the discussion

by ssmiles08 » Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:09 am
lol what A???

which makes NO sense to me btw lol
You got a dream... You gotta protect it. People can't do somethin' themselves, they wanna tell you you can't do it. If you want somethin', go get it. Period.
Join the discussion

by ogbeni » Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:39 am
It has got to be E because Siegfried uses evidence of a correlation ("My father's standard of living is nowhere near as high as his parents' was") to argue the existence of a causal relationship ("and my own standard of living is already higher than that of my parents").

The causal relationship is established when Siegried says "That's simply untrue". [Well why is Brunhilda's statement untrue?]***[BECAUSE]*** "My father's standard of living is nowhere near as high as his parents' was [ CORRELATION], "and my own standard ofliving is already higher than that of my parents [CORRELATION]"
Join the discussion