Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 1
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 1 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand5 seats leftStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Siberia's Lake Baikal

Expert replies
by dlencz » Mon Apr 23, 2012 9:03 am
The following sentence was correct in an SC question but I discarded it because when you take out the text within the commas it completely changes the meaning, something I learned to look out for from a previous question. Can someone explain to me why that reasoning is wrong in this particular example?

More than 300 rivers drain in Siberia's Lake Baikal, which holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water, more than all of the North American Great Lakes combined.

Thanks.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Mike@Magoosh » Mon Apr 23, 2012 1:47 pm
Hi, there. I'm happy to help with this. :)

First of all, for the whole "clause between the commas" changes vs. doesn't change the meaning, I suggest you learn a little about the grammatical background --- restrictive clauses and, related to that, vital noun modifiers. I have attached two pdfs of blogs on these very topics that I just wrote last week --- these will appear on the Magoosh blog in the next week or so, but here are advanced copies.

Those blogs describe the basic sentence of the form

blah blah blah A, modifier of A, blah blah blah.

Instead, your sentence is of the form

blah blah blah A, modifier of A, modifier of something in the first modifier.

More than 300 rivers drain in Siberia's Lake Baikal, which holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water, more than all of the North American Great Lakes combined.

More than 300 rivers drain in Siberia's Lake Baikal = Independent clause

which holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water = relative clause, non-restrictive, modifies "Lake Baikal"

more than all of the North American Great Lakes combined = appositive clause, modifies "20 percent"

That's a completely different scenario. When you remove the middle modifier, of course the whole sentence is going to be discombobulated, because the second modifier refers to something in the first modifier, and if the first modifier is gone, the second modifier is modifying something that isn't there!

BTW, notice: the middle clause correctly has commas around it because it is a non-restrictive clause.

You have to be careful --- are you looking at

independent clause --- modifier --- more independent clause

or is it

independent clause --- modifier #1 --- modifier #2.

In those two cases, there are very different considerations at play.

Does all this make sense? For free, here's also a lesson video on related SC stuff:
https://gmat.magoosh.com/lessons/615-modifiers-i

I hope all that is helpful. Please let me know if you have any further questions.

BTW, thanks for the cool facts about Lake Baikal --- I had never heard of it before, but that's really cool! :)

Mike :-)
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
https://gmat.magoosh.com/
Join the discussion

by dlencz » Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:34 pm
Thank you for taking the time to write that out. That's helpful.
Join the discussion