BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of complete EA OnDemand
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Shallow People : Computer Skills v/s Analytical Skills

Expert replies
by RumpelThickSkin » Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:56 am
Unlike computer skills or other technical skills, there is a disinclination on the part of many people to recognize the degree to which their analytical skills are weak.

(A) Unlike computer skills or other technical skills, there is a disinclination on the part of many people to recognize the degree to which their analytical skills are weak.

(B) Unlike computer skills or other technical skills, which they admit they lack, many people are disinclined to recognize that their analytical skills are weak.

(C) Unlike computer skills or other technical skills, analytical skills bring out a disinclination in many people to recognize that they are weak to a degree.

(D) Many people, willing to admit that they lack computer skills or other technical skills, are disinclined to recognize that their analytical skills are weak.

(E) Many people have a disinclination to recognize the weakness of their analytical skills while willing to admit their lack of computer skills or other technical skills.

OA (does anyone really need it) : D

I really don't get this question. Why is C wrong and what with the modifiers on this one. Can someone please in detail why we would pick D over C and E. Many thanks for your reply on this.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by blaster » Fri Jun 11, 2010 11:49 am
Unlike computer skills or other technical skills, there is a disinclination on the part of many people to recognize the degree to which their analytical skills are weak.

(A) Unlike computer skills or other technical skills, there is a disinclination on the part of many people to recognize the degree to which their analytical skills are weak. (modifier problem : computer skills and other technical skills not modified correctly after comma)

(B) Unlike computer skills or other technical skills, which they admit they lack, many people are disinclined to recognize that their analytical skills are weak. (same as A)

(C) Unlike computer skills or other technical skills, analytical skills bring out a disinclination in many people to recognize that they are weak to a degree. ( that they are weak to a degree - is awkward)

(D) Many people, willing to admit that they lack computer skills or other technical skills, are disinclined to recognize that their analytical skills are weak. (correct)

(E) Many people have a disinclination to recognize the weakness of their analytical skills while willing to admit their lack of computer skills or other technical skills. (while willing is not correct)
Join the discussion

by hardik.jadeja » Fri Jun 11, 2010 11:51 am
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:30 am
(d) vs (e):
* "have a disinclination to recognize" is wordy/unidiomatic, and is definitely inferior to "are disinclined to recognize".

* if you're going to use "while" with an adjective phrase (while willing to...), then that adjective phrase should precede the main verb.
i.e., many people, while willing to... , are disinclined to...

* there's also a slight change in meaning.
"recognize that their ... skills are weak" just means that the people should know that they have weak skills.
"recognize the weakness..." means that they should actually be able to point out the specific weakness.

(c):

two fatal errors of meaning.

first, the sentence just says that the people are "weak to a degree" -- i.e., it doesn't actually specify that the people are actually weak at analytical skills.
taken literally, this sentence says that the analytical skills make people unwilling to admit that they are weak (in general, not just at analytical skills) -- this is not the intended meaning of the sentence.

second, the sentence, if taken literally (as it must be), says that analytical skills themselves bring out this disinclination.
therefore, if we interpret this choice literally, it only applies to people who actually have analytical skills (since the analytical skills themselves bring out this disinclination -- so the disinclination couldn't appear in people who don't have the skills!).
this doesn't make sense, since the sentence is supposed to be talking about people who don't have very good analytical skills.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by martin.jonson007 » Mon Jun 14, 2010 5:48 am
lunarpower wrote:(d) vs (e):
* "have a disinclination to recognize" is wordy/unidiomatic, and is definitely inferior to "are disinclined to recognize".

* if you're going to use "while" with an adjective phrase (while willing to...), then that adjective phrase should precede the main verb.
i.e., many people, while willing to... , are disinclined to...

* there's also a slight change in meaning.
"recognize that their ... skills are weak" just means that the people should know that they have weak skills.
"recognize the weakness..." means that they should actually be able to point out the specific weakness.

(c):

two fatal errors of meaning.

first, the sentence just says that the people are "weak to a degree" -- i.e., it doesn't actually specify that the people are actually weak at analytical skills.
taken literally, this sentence says that the analytical skills make people unwilling to admit that they are weak (in general, not just at analytical skills) -- this is not the intended meaning of the sentence.

second, the sentence, if taken literally (as it must be), says that analytical skills themselves bring out this disinclination.
therefore, if we interpret this choice literally, it only applies to people who actually have analytical skills (since the analytical skills themselves bring out this disinclination -- so the disinclination couldn't appear in people who don't have the skills!).
this doesn't make sense, since the sentence is supposed to be talking about people who don't have very good analytical skills.
SO depthful comments....!

Great...!
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1