BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

seven small companies

Expert replies
by abcgmat » Wed May 09, 2012 4:32 am
Three large companies and seven small companies currently manufacture a product with potential military
applications. If the government regulates the industry, it will institute a single set of manufacturing specifications to which all ten companies will have to adhere. In this case, therefore, since none of the seven small companies can afford to convert their production lines to a new set of manufacturing specifications, only the three large companies will be able to remain in business. Which of the following is an assumption on which the author's argument relies?
A. None of the three large companies will go out of business if the government does not regulate the manufacture of the product.
B. It would cost more to convert the production lines of the small companies to a new set of manufacturing specifications than it would to convert the production lines of the large companies.
C. Industry lobbyists will be unable to dissuade the government from regulating the industry.
D. Assembly of the product produced according to government manufacturing specifications would be more complex than current assembly procedures.
E. None of the seven small companies currently manufactures the product to a set of specifications that would match those the government would institute if the industry were to be regulated.

[spoiler]OA:E[/spoiler]
Could you let mw know how to logically negate option A, as it has (none, not) more negation words
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by confuse mind » Wed May 09, 2012 4:42 am
IMO - E

None ------->(logical negation) Some (atleast 1)
Some of the large...................

I hope you don't want to know why A does not fit in the correct answer choice.
Join the discussion

by abcgmat » Wed May 09, 2012 5:02 am
Hi Confuse mind,

Thank you for the explanation. I am still confused

conclusion of the argument is :If the government regulates, Only three large companies will remain, implying that none of the seven will remain

Logically negated conclusion is :Even If the government regulates, Some of the 7 small companies will remain.

Option A: None of the three large companies will go out of business if the government does not regulate the manufacture of the product

There are two possible answers when we negate
(i)Some of the three large companies will go out of business if the government does not regulate the manufacture of the product
--The argument talks about the situation when regulation happens . Out of Scope

(ii)None of the three large companies will go out of business if the government does regulate the manufacture of the product
--this is already mentioned in the argument that the three large companies will remain, hence is not assumption

The two versions of the negated choice are different . Which one of them is correct
I get confused on how to negate the answer choice if it involes more than 1 negation words, even if they may not hurt the argument.
Do we have technique which can solve this issue
Join the discussion

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Wed May 09, 2012 8:25 am
When negating, we want to focus on the dominant clause (the main idea of the sentence). In this case, since the conclusion is mainly about going out of business, I think we can say that A's main idea is the part about going out of business.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion

by abcgmat » Wed May 09, 2012 10:53 pm
Option A: None of the three large companies will go out of business if the government does not regulate the manufacture of the product

Does it imply that
Logical negation should be: some of the large companies will not go out of business if the government does regulate the manufacture of the product
Join the discussion