BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

set problem

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by cramya » Mon Oct 27, 2008 5:30 pm
I get E)

OA,please?

Hi Ch,
Friendly request: If you could post the OA wiht the spoiler function going forward it would be much appreciated!
Join the discussion

by logitech » Mon Oct 27, 2008 6:15 pm
cramya wrote:I get E)

OA,please?

Hi Ch,
Friendly request: If you could post the OA wiht the spoiler function going forward it would be much appreciated!
I agree both with your spoiler request and E choice.

1) Insuf X can be 1000000000000 and the mean can;t be greater than the AV

2) Insuf - it only tells us that x > 12 and with the same logic in (1) it can be 10000000000000 and mean can't be greater than AV
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by ch0719 » Mon Oct 27, 2008 7:35 pm
Yes E is correct

Sry I didn't know how to do the spoiler thing at first, now I do :)
Join the discussion

by tkhalid » Mon Oct 27, 2008 9:57 pm
Sir, what is "AV"?
Join the discussion

by logitech » Mon Oct 27, 2008 11:49 pm
tkhalid wrote:Sir, what is "AV"?
average (arithmetic mean)
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by praneeth » Thu Nov 06, 2008 7:07 pm
logitech wrote:
cramya wrote:I get E)

OA,please?

Hi Ch,
Friendly request: If you could post the OA wiht the spoiler function going forward it would be much appreciated!
I agree both with your spoiler request and E choice.

1) Insuf X can be 1000000000000 and the mean can;t be greater than the AV

2) Insuf - it only tells us that x > 12 and with the same logic in (1) it can be 10000000000000 and mean can't be greater than AV
Agree with the answer but the reasoning has to rule out a definite "No" to the question, as a definite "No" would make the statements sufficient as well.

To rule out a definite No:

From statement two, we basically know that if X is higher than the median, which implies that the median has to be 8. Since the sum of the four numbers given is 24, if X is 9 then the arithmetic average is 33/5 = less than 8 (the median), however if X is instead something large like 21, the arithmetic average is 45/5 = 9 (greater than 8 - the median). Therefore a definite "No" is not possible in this case.

Therefore answer is E.
Join the discussion

by jimmiejaz » Fri Nov 07, 2008 1:58 am
[quote="praneeth]Agree with the answer but the reasoning has to rule out a definite "No" to the question, as a definite "No" would make the statements sufficient as well.

To rule out a definite No:

From statement two, we basically know that if X is higher than the median, which implies that the median has to be 8. Since the sum of the four numbers given is 24, if X is 9 then the arithmetic average is 33/5 = less than 8 (the median), however if X is instead something large like 21, the arithmetic average is 45/5 = 9 (greater than 8 - the median). Therefore a definite "No" is not possible in this case.

Therefore answer is E.[/quote]

hi,

can u pls explain how the median is 8?
Join the discussion

by jimmiejaz » Fri Nov 07, 2008 2:03 am
logitech wrote:

2) Insuf - it only tells us that x > 12 and with the same logic in (1) it can be 10000000000000 and mean can't be greater than AV
Logitech,

Shouldnt stmt 2 give us x>8 instead of x>12? Am i missing something here?
Join the discussion

by praneeth » Fri Nov 07, 2008 5:04 am
jimmiejaz wrote:[quote="praneeth]Agree with the answer but the reasoning has to rule out a definite "No" to the question, as a definite "No" would make the statements sufficient as well.

To rule out a definite No:

From statement two, we basically know that if X is higher than the median, which implies that the median has to be 8. Since the sum of the four numbers given is 24, if X is 9 then the arithmetic average is 33/5 = less than 8 (the median), however if X is instead something large like 21, the arithmetic average is 45/5 = 9 (greater than 8 - the median). Therefore a definite "No" is not possible in this case.

Therefore answer is E.
hi,

can u pls explain how the median is 8?[/quote]

If X is smaller than 8 and larger than the median the numbers would look something like:

1, 3, X, 8 12

since there are only two numbers smaller than X, and two numbers greater than X no other number can be the median, i.e. X has to be the median which doesn't satisfy our assumption that X is greater than the median.

There are only two numbers smaller than 8 in the data set, therefore for X to be greater than the median X has to be greater than 8.
Join the discussion

by jimmiejaz » Fri Nov 07, 2008 5:22 am
hi praneeth,

thanks for the explanation. Actually, i got confused. In the post above yours, i had deduced the same that x>8 for x to be greater than the median. I asked x>8 and you wrote median = 8. both are different interpretations for the same thing.
cheers!!!!!
Join the discussion