BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

set of numbers

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 324
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 6:29 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 17 times
by rahul.s » Sun Jan 31, 2010 6:25 am
R is a set of numbers such that

if m is in R, then -2m is in R, and
if each of m and n is in R, then mn is in R.
Is 60 in R?

1) 3 is in R.
2) 5 is in R.

OA: C
Last edited by rahul.s on Sun Jan 31, 2010 7:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Data Sufficiency |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1275
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 11:13 pmFollowed by: 2 members
Location: Arabian Sea
Thanked: 125 times

by ajith » Sun Jan 31, 2010 6:37 am
rahul.s wrote:R is a set of numbers such that

if m is in R, then -2m is in R, and
if each of m and n is in R, then mn is in R.
Is 60 in R?

1) 3 is in R.
2) 5 is in R.

OA: C

1) 3 is in R

Is not sufficient since it is helpful in proving, 3, -6, -18, 12...etc (none of these factors have prime factors other than 2&3)

So 60 is not an option since 60 has prime factors 2,3 and 5

2)Is not sufficient since it is helpful in proving, 5, -10, -50, 20 ...etc (none of these factors have prime factors other than 2&3)

So 60 is not an option since 60 has prime factors 2,3 and 5

combining 1&2

3 and 5 are in R -- 15 is in R ; -30 is in R ; 60 is in R
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1560
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 2:38 amFollowed by: 5 members
Thanked: 137 times

by thephoenix » Sun Jan 31, 2010 7:30 am
ajith wrote:
rahul.s wrote:R is a set of numbers such that

if m is in R, then -2m is in R, and
if each of m and n is in R, then mn is in R.
Is 60 in R?

1) 3 is in R.
2) 5 is in R.

OA: C

1) 3 is in R

Is not sufficient since it is helpful in proving, 3, -6, -18, 12...etc (none of these factors have prime factors other than 2&3)

So 60 is not an option since 60 has prime factors 2,3 and 5

hi ajit y at this point we can not say that no 60 is not in R and therefore this statement is suff.????



2)Is not sufficient since it is helpful in proving, 5, -10, -50, 20 ...etc (none of these factors have prime factors other than 2&3)

So 60 is not an option since 60 has prime factors 2,3 and 5

combining 1&2

3 and 5 are in R -- 15 is in R ; -30 is in R ; 60 is in R
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1275
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 11:13 pmFollowed by: 2 members
Location: Arabian Sea
Thanked: 125 times

by ajith » Sun Jan 31, 2010 10:10 am
thephoenix wrote:
So 60 is not an option since 60 has prime factors 2,3 and 5

hi ajit y at this point we can not say that no 60 is not in R and therefore this statement is suff.????
Nope, You don't know whether 5 is in R or not

All you know is 3 is in R, 5 may or may not be in R and thus we cannot say No to the question
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 324
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 6:29 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 17 times

by rahul.s » Sun Jan 31, 2010 9:44 pm
if m is in R, then -2m is in R.
and if m and n are in R, then mn are in R

statement 1

hence, 3, -6, 12, -24, 48, -96, so on and so forth. insufficient.

statement 2

5, -10, 20, -40, 80, -160 et cetera. insufficient

combining

3 and 5 are in R.

mn are in R

hence, 15, -30, 60.
sufficient.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1