BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Sequences

Expert replies
by ashish2104 » Mon Aug 16, 2010 1:09 am
209. After the first term, each term in a sequence is five times greater than half the preceding term. If x is the first term of the sequence, and x does not equal zero, what is the value of the fourth term minus the second term an integer?
(1) x is a multiple of 12.
(2) x is a multiple of 56.



I am not sure how the ans is B.Morever, I dont the answer is offical answer. I think answer should be E. Any comments.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by sanju09 » Mon Aug 16, 2010 1:37 am
ashish2104 wrote:209. After the first term, each term in a sequence is five times greater than half the preceding term. If x is the first term of the sequence, and x does not equal zero, what is was the value of the fourth term minus the second term an integer?
(1) x is a multiple of 12.
(2) x is a multiple of 56.



I am not sure how the ans is B.Morever, I dont the answer is offical answer. I think answer should be E. Any comments.
When x is the first term, 5 x/2 is the second, 25 x/4 the third, and 125 x/8 the fourth one. Now, the value of the fourth term minus the second term

= 125 x/8 - 5 x/2

= 105 x/8

I think the correct wordings of the question are

Was the value of the fourth term minus the second term an integer?

or Is the value 105 x/8 an integer?

(1) A multiple of 12 is not necessarily a multiple of 8. Insufficient

(2) A multiple of 56 is always a multiple of 8. [spoiler]Sufficient


B
[/spoiler]
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion

by ashish2104 » Mon Aug 16, 2010 1:45 am
Yes Sanju, I agree with your ANs B for the new question where 105x/8 is an integer.
But for the given question, even after taking both options we have indefinite values as x would be a multiple of 168.
Join the discussion

by sanju09 » Tue Aug 17, 2010 4:54 am
ashish2104 wrote:Yes Sanju, I agree with your ANs B for the new question where 105x/8 is an integer.
But for the given question, even after taking both options we have indefinite values as x would be a multiple of 168.
I can't see in my post where I termed 105 x/8 as a given integer. This is in fact the core question to be answered, please read again

Is the value 105 x/8 an integer?

The answer solely depends on the value of x, that is, if x is a multiple of 8, then only the value 105 x/8 is an integer. Statement 1 doesn't provide the surety whereas Statement 2 does.


Can you please provide us with the right interpretation of this Grammar?
If x is the first term of the sequence, and x does not equal zero, what is the value of the fourth term minus the second term an integer?
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion

by ashish2104 » Tue Aug 17, 2010 5:51 am
Ryt Sanju. I think i missed reading the last word.....A big mistake, which I hope not to repeat on test day.
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Tue Aug 17, 2010 5:54 am
ashish2104 wrote:Ryt Sanju. I think i missed reading the last word.....A big mistake, which I hope not to repeat on test day.
Ashish, we never said u wrongly interpreted the question..we just said that the question is worded wrongly...
Join the discussion