BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Sequences

Expert replies
by ashish2104 » Mon Aug 16, 2010 1:09 am
209. After the first term, each term in a sequence is five times greater than half the preceding term. If x is the first term of the sequence, and x does not equal zero, what is the value of the fourth term minus the second term an integer?
(1) x is a multiple of 12.
(2) x is a multiple of 56.



I am not sure how the ans is B.Morever, I dont the answer is offical answer. I think answer should be E. Any comments.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by sanju09 » Mon Aug 16, 2010 1:37 am
ashish2104 wrote:209. After the first term, each term in a sequence is five times greater than half the preceding term. If x is the first term of the sequence, and x does not equal zero, what is was the value of the fourth term minus the second term an integer?
(1) x is a multiple of 12.
(2) x is a multiple of 56.



I am not sure how the ans is B.Morever, I dont the answer is offical answer. I think answer should be E. Any comments.
When x is the first term, 5 x/2 is the second, 25 x/4 the third, and 125 x/8 the fourth one. Now, the value of the fourth term minus the second term

= 125 x/8 - 5 x/2

= 105 x/8

I think the correct wordings of the question are

Was the value of the fourth term minus the second term an integer?

or Is the value 105 x/8 an integer?

(1) A multiple of 12 is not necessarily a multiple of 8. Insufficient

(2) A multiple of 56 is always a multiple of 8. [spoiler]Sufficient


B
[/spoiler]
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion

by ashish2104 » Mon Aug 16, 2010 1:45 am
Yes Sanju, I agree with your ANs B for the new question where 105x/8 is an integer.
But for the given question, even after taking both options we have indefinite values as x would be a multiple of 168.
Join the discussion

by sanju09 » Tue Aug 17, 2010 4:54 am
ashish2104 wrote:Yes Sanju, I agree with your ANs B for the new question where 105x/8 is an integer.
But for the given question, even after taking both options we have indefinite values as x would be a multiple of 168.
I can't see in my post where I termed 105 x/8 as a given integer. This is in fact the core question to be answered, please read again

Is the value 105 x/8 an integer?

The answer solely depends on the value of x, that is, if x is a multiple of 8, then only the value 105 x/8 is an integer. Statement 1 doesn't provide the surety whereas Statement 2 does.


Can you please provide us with the right interpretation of this Grammar?
If x is the first term of the sequence, and x does not equal zero, what is the value of the fourth term minus the second term an integer?
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion

by ashish2104 » Tue Aug 17, 2010 5:51 am
Ryt Sanju. I think i missed reading the last word.....A big mistake, which I hope not to repeat on test day.
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Tue Aug 17, 2010 5:54 am
ashish2104 wrote:Ryt Sanju. I think i missed reading the last word.....A big mistake, which I hope not to repeat on test day.
Ashish, we never said u wrongly interpreted the question..we just said that the question is worded wrongly...
Join the discussion