BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

sequence

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by tryin700 » Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:16 pm
1) INSUFF: we do not know anything about the sequence

X2=X1/2 and so on .. Just gives us the formula of terms in the sequence

2) gives relationship of X4 and X5 : INSUFF

Combine

X5=(X4)/(X4+1)
and from 1 we get X5=X4/2

2 equations we can solve and hence on further calculation using 1 we can get X1

Hence C
Join the discussion

by tohellandback » Tue Jul 14, 2009 12:39 am
IMO E
after combining we get

X5=(X4)/(X4+1)
and X5=X4/2
this X4=1 and X5=1/2 this contradictory to the condition that the given sequence contains positive numbers.
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!
Join the discussion

by sreak1089 » Tue Jul 14, 2009 7:54 am
Answer is C only.

If you read the question properly, it says, sequence of positive numbers x1,x2,x3,.... and not positive integers.
Join the discussion

by tohellandback » Tue Jul 14, 2009 8:01 am
sreak1089 wrote:Answer is C only.

If you read the question properly, it says, sequence of positive numbers x1,x2,x3,.... and not positive integers.
I think I am getting all confused here..
are fractions numbers??
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!
Join the discussion

by sreak1089 » Tue Jul 14, 2009 8:21 am
Yes fractions are very much numbers and by all means.
But fractions are NOT integers or whole numbers or natural numbers.
Fractions come under the definition of rational numbers.

I have given definitions below:


1) Integers: ...-5,-4,-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3,4,5....
2) Natural numbers: 1,2,3,4,5,..... (Set of Positive numbers only)
3) Whole numbers: 0,1,2,3,4,5,....(Zero + Set of Positive numbers)
4) Rational numbers: Any number that can be expressed in
the form of p/q (where q != 0) is called a rational number.
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:19 am
tohellandback wrote:IMO E
after combining we get

X5=(X4)/(X4+1)
and X5=X4/2
this X4=1 and X5=1/2 this contradictory to the condition that the given sequence contains positive numbers.
This is a common DS rule interpretation error, so it's important to understand the mistake you made.

In DS, the information in the statements will NEVER contradict the conditions in the stem. The conditions in the stem may limit which numbers you are allowed to pick, but there will always be at least one number that satisfies both the stem and the statements.

So, if you end up with a seeming contradiction (i.e. no possible number), it does not mean that the answer is E - it means that you have made a mistake somewhere along the way.

Answer "E" states that the statements are insufficient to answer the question, not that there is no possible answer. Since there's no answer choice that reflects "there is no possible value for x", that's not a possible result of the exercise.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by shibal » Tue Jul 14, 2009 3:45 pm
i got to x5=x4/2 but i couldn't see how to get x1.... dat's why i ended up choosng E... how can we get to x1?
Join the discussion

by tohellandback » Tue Jul 14, 2009 5:46 pm
Stuart Kovinsky wrote:
tohellandback wrote:IMO E
after combining we get

X5=(X4)/(X4+1)
and X5=X4/2
this X4=1 and X5=1/2 this contradictory to the condition that the given sequence contains positive numbers.
This is a common DS rule interpretation error, so it's important to understand the mistake you made.

In DS, the information in the statements will NEVER contradict the conditions in the stem. The conditions in the stem may limit which numbers you are allowed to pick, but there will always be at least one number that satisfies both the stem and the statements.

So, if you end up with a seeming contradiction (i.e. no possible number), it does not mean that the answer is E - it means that you have made a mistake somewhere along the way.

Answer "E" states that the statements are insufficient to answer the question, not that there is no possible answer. Since there's no answer choice that reflects "there is no possible value for x", that's not a possible result of the exercise.
thanks Stuart, I understand now. I hope I will remember that during the test
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!
Join the discussion