BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Sentence Intent vs. Best Grammar Choice

Expert replies
by student22 » Sun Dec 27, 2009 8:31 pm

Code: Select all

The most prominent result of Professor Winick's archaeological research has been [u]discovering that a pharaoh who had ruled in the last days of Egypt was buried with fewer artifacts than their[/u] earlier counterparts.

A. discovering that a pharaoh who had ruled in the last days of Egypt was buried with fewer artifacts than their

B. the discovery that pharaohs who had ruled in the last days of Egypt were not buried with as many artifacts as their

C. to discover that pharaohs, which ruled in the last days of Egypt, was buried with fewer artifacts than their

D. the discovery that pharaohs who ruled in the last days of Egypt were buried with fewer artifacts than were their

E. to discover that a pharaoh who ruled in the last days of Egypt was buried with fewer artifacts than were his
Correct answer according to the guide is D. I picked E.

My question is this: the correct answer D changes the meaning of the sentence even though it has better grammar.

The original sentence talks about the archaeologist's discovery of a single pharaoh, (not multiple pharaohs) who ruled at the end of Egypt who has less artifacts than his predecessors.

I immediately ruled out any answer choices that spoke of pharaohs in the plural. I understand that E is not grammatically perfect but I thought the main point of any answer in Sentence Correction was that it not change the meaning of the original sentence? Am I wrong? Thanks.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Testluv » Sun Dec 27, 2009 8:46 pm
Hi there,

yes, there is a hierarchy in sentence correction: 1) grammatical correctness; 2) preserve intended meaning; and 3) style.

So, grammar is actually more important than meaning. If you chop it down to two choices, and they are both grammatically correct, then select the one that better preserves the speaker's intended meaning.

However, sometimes, a speaker's intended meaning differs from the literal meaning of her words. In other words, sometimes a speaker may hot have said what she actually meant to say. How can you tell? You have to use your critical reasoning skills.

Here, the underlining is:

discovering that a pharoah who had ruled in the last days of Egypt was buried with fewer artifacts than their ...earlier counterparts.

What he means by "a pharoah who ...ruled in the last days of Egypt" is "ANY pharoah who lived in the last days of Egypt." (Like, if I say "a fan of the Raiders would say X", then what I may mean is "ANY fan of the Raiders would say X").

We know this because the speaker is comparing this type of pharoah to earlier counterparts.
So, he is comparing this type of pharoah to something plural, and the plural part is in the non-underlined portion, which is always correct. (Also, if it were just one pharoah, then it probably wouldn't be a "prominent result".)

So, in fact, choice D doesn't change the meaning; instead, it does a better job of conveying the speaker's intended meaning.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion

by student22 » Sun Dec 27, 2009 8:54 pm
Hi Testluv, this is the second time you've helped me this week. I appreciate it.

I knew there was a hierarchy, I just thought that sentence meaning took precedence. Now I know that's not the case.

The words "their" and "counterparts" threw me off. I see what you mean that the the author was most likely trying to compare this type of pharaoh to previous ones. I just wasn't sure how far I was allowed to go in the GMAT in inferring the meaning of a sentence. (I thought I didn't have a lot of leeway).

Thanks for the explanation, it makes sense.
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Mon Dec 28, 2009 2:28 am
student22 wrote:Hi Testluv, this is the second time you've helped me this week. I appreciate it.

I knew there was a hierarchy, I just thought that sentence meaning took precedence. Now I know that's not the case.

The words "their" and "counterparts" threw me off. I see what you mean that the the author was most likely trying to compare this type of pharaoh to previous ones. I just wasn't sure how far I was allowed to go in the GMAT in inferring the meaning of a sentence. (I thought I didn't have a lot of leeway).

Thanks for the explanation, it makes sense.
No problem.

Here are a couple of tips/rules for ascertaining intended meaning:

1. The non-underlined portion is always correct. Thus, you can use the non-underlined portion to assist in ascertaining intent.

2. The intended meaning can never be anything absurd. So, if the literal meaning is absurd, you know you can eliminate any choices that fail to rectify that absurd meaning. Example: "those houses were destroyed and then damaged".

3. Also, it is rare for the intended meaning to be something that is very unlikely or implausible. I would say this sentence is a good example of this point:

In this sentence, because the non-underlined portion used "counterparts", because the underlined portion used "their", and because it is unlikely that the discovery of a single pharoah would rank as the Professor's "most prominent result", it is very unlikely that the intended meaning was the discovery of a single pharaoh.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion

by student22 » Mon Dec 28, 2009 8:29 am
Got it, thanks for clarifying how much I can read into the author's intent.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1