Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 563 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Segregation

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Subscribe topic
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 114
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 5:33 pm
by showbu » Fri Jan 09, 2009 8:17 pm
Since 1954, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation was unconstitutional, the Supreme Court heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation.

a. heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation.

b.had heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation.

c. has heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation.

d. has heard cases in which lawyers debated what has constituted segregation.

e. was hearing cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation.
Top
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2134
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pmFollowed by: 25 members
Thanked: 237 times
GMAT Score:730

Re: Segregation

by logitech » Fri Jan 09, 2009 8:23 pm
Since 1954, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation was unconstitutional, the Supreme Court heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation.

Since needs present perfect tense so A, B and E are gone.

Between C and D

I will go with D, since it we need to another present perfect tense



c. has heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation.

d. has heard cases in which lawyers debated what has constituted
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Top
Join the discussion
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 424
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Sydney
Thanked: 12 times

Re: Segregation

by piyush_nitt » Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:41 am
showbu wrote:Since 1954, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation was unconstitutional, the Supreme Court heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation.

a. heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation.

b.had heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation.

c. has heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation.

d. has heard cases in which lawyers debated what has constituted segregation.

e. was hearing cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation.
We need present perfect tense with Since.

IMO C

c. has heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation.

d. has heard cases in which lawyers debated what has constituted segregation

Hearing is still done , therefore has heard and lawyers debated in the past, therefore constituted.
Top
Join the discussion
Legendary Member
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:22 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 55 times

by iamcste » Sat Jan 10, 2009 1:32 am
will go for D

similar reasons as Logi
Top
Join the discussion
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 424
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Sydney
Thanked: 12 times

Re: Segregation

by piyush_nitt » Sat Jan 10, 2009 1:37 am
[quote="logitech"]
Since needs present perfect tense so A, B and E are gone.

[/quote]

Can you please explain the reason?

Thanks mate!
Top
Join the discussion
Legendary Member
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:22 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 55 times

Re: Segregation

by iamcste » Sat Jan 10, 2009 1:45 am
piyush_nitt wrote:
logitech wrote: Since needs present perfect tense so A, B and E are gone.
Can you please explain the reason?

Thanks mate!

since 1897, my alma mater teaches a gamut of management subjects

This is means , action started in the past and effects are still present

( Institute was created in 1897 and still existent..so present perfect)
Top
Join the discussion
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 424
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Sydney
Thanked: 12 times

Re: Segregation

by piyush_nitt » Sat Jan 10, 2009 1:48 am
[quote="logitech"]
Since needs present perfect tense so A, B and E are gone.

[/quote]

Can you please explain the reason?

Thanks mate!
Top
Join the discussion
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2134
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pmFollowed by: 25 members
Thanked: 237 times
GMAT Score:730

Re: Segregation

by logitech » Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:42 pm
piyush_nitt wrote:
logitech wrote: Since needs present perfect tense so A, B and E are gone.
Can you please explain the reason?

Thanks mate!
iamcste leave piyush alone!! :)

Piyush,

Since always marks a time in the past which continues to the present. And this calls the usage of present perfect tense.

You can get the feeling better from the link above and solve the little quiz to hard wire this concept:

https://www.eclecticenglish.com/grammar/ ... ect1D.html
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Top
Join the discussion
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 431
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 9:32 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 16 times

Re: Segregation

by kanha81 » Sat Jan 10, 2009 1:21 pm
piyush_nitt wrote:
showbu wrote:Since 1954, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation was unconstitutional, the Supreme Court heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation.

a. heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation.

b.had heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation.

c. has heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation.

d. has heard cases in which lawyers debated what has constituted segregation.

e. was hearing cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation.
We need present perfect tense with Since.

IMO C

c. has heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation.

d. has heard cases in which lawyers debated what has constituted segregation

Hearing is still done , therefore has heard and lawyers debated in the past, therefore constituted.
I agree with Piyush because when I break it down, "has heard" and is ongoing action (that is carried over from the past- like lawyers debated) where the issue being debated is that of segregation. The issue is being debated and not the causes of the issue.
Want to Beat GMAT.
Always do what you're afraid to do. Whoooop GMAT
Top
Join the discussion
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 114
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 5:33 pm

Re: Segregation

by showbu » Sat Jan 10, 2009 8:34 pm
OA C
showbu wrote:Since 1954, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation was unconstitutional, the Supreme Court heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation.

a. heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation.

b.had heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation.

c. has heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation.

d. has heard cases in which lawyers debated what has constituted segregation.

e. was hearing cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation.
Last edited by showbu on Sat Jan 10, 2009 9:55 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Top
Join the discussion
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2134
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pmFollowed by: 25 members
Thanked: 237 times
GMAT Score:730

by logitech » Sat Jan 10, 2009 9:15 pm
I DONT THINK SO!! :cry:
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Top
Join the discussion
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 114
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 5:33 pm

by showbu » Sat Jan 10, 2009 9:53 pm
Typo, C, sorry
logitech wrote:I DONT THINK SO!! :cry:
Top
Join the discussion
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2134
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pmFollowed by: 25 members
Thanked: 237 times
GMAT Score:730

by logitech » Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:25 am
showbu wrote:Typo, C, sorry
logitech wrote:I DONT THINK SO!! :cry:
So the OA is still C :(
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Top
Join the discussion
User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 10:43 am
Location: Saint-Petersburg, Russia
GMAT Score:560

by kiton » Sun Jun 05, 2011 3:55 am
Hello!

Please, let me take my chances and try to explain the reason for C:

in D we have Present Perfect tense (has heard) in the 1st part of the sentence and also the same tense (has constituted) in the 2nd part thus we can "drop" (read "skip") HAS in the 2nd part => C is correct according to GMAT.
Top
Join the discussion
Legendary Member
Posts: 544
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:10 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 45 times

by sameerballani » Sun Jun 05, 2011 4:27 am
showbu wrote:Since 1954, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation was unconstitutional, the Supreme Court heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation.

c. has heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation.

d. has heard cases in which lawyers debated what has constituted segregation.
Since makes it clear we need to go with present perfect.So left with option C and D
IMO C
the usage has constituted shows the verb/its effect is still true.
But in option C-> it clearly states the topic of debate: What constituted segregation.
Top
Join the discussion