BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Scientists who endeavor to explain the way scientific work

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Thu Jun 07, 2018 4:23 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

Scientists who endeavor to explain the way scientific work was done in the laboratories of the seventeenth-century chemists, must address a fundamental inconsistency between the way such experiments were actually performed and the way the seventeenth-century rhetoric describing them

A. Scientists who endeavor to explain the way scientific work was done in the laboratories of the seventeenth-century chemists, must address a fundamental inconsistency between the way such experiments were actually performed and the way the seventeenth-century rhetoric describing them

B. Scientists who endeavor to explain how scientific work was done in the laboratories of the seventeenth-century chemists, and must address the fundamental inconsistency in the way such experiments were actually performed and the way the seventeenth-century rhetoric described them

C. Scientists endeavoring to explain how scientific work was done in the laboratories of the seventeenth-century chemists, and who must address a fundamental inconsistency distorting the actual manner of such experiments from the description by the seventeenth-century rhetoric.

D. Scientists endeavoring to explain how scientific work was done in the laboratories of the seventeenth-century chemists, must address a fundamental inconsistency of the actual manner of such experiments and the way the seventeenth-century rhetoric described it

E. Scientists who endeavor to explain how scientific work was done in the laboratories of the seventeenth-century chemists, must address a fundamental inconsistency between how such experiments were actually performed and how the same were described by the seventeenth-century rhetoric
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by deloitte247 » Fri Jun 15, 2018 2:40 pm
However technically an article may be and most still be analysed critically in order to solving the question.

In Option A - INCORRECT. There is a situation of ineffective language use in the form of a continuous verb ''describing'' even though the article was about seventeenth century laboratory work. It is also a lifted response from the article.

In Option B - INCORRECT. We must try to pay attention to every word involved in this statement. For an instance, the pronoun ''them'' was used in this option as a replacement word though the position and manner makes it look like it was modifying the scientists which in actual term is not.

In Option C. The use of ''endeavoring'' here is not suitable at all in that it's a verb that's been used in a continuous form even when all the other verb parts explained the statement in their past tense.

Option D - INCORRECT. Here, two words have been caught to fall off the normal sentence formation. The first is ''endeavoring'' which has been explained in the Option C above, the second being the pronoun ''it'' which describes a single item which will not qualify the plural form of ''experiments'' that's been used.

In Option E - CORRECT. Here, the keywords so explained front previous options are in their right forms. Example is ''described'', so also is ''were'' all consistent with the article explanation. This statement' analysis is appropriate enough because it has been re-written in the form prescribed by the writer.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1