School official: The rate of childhood obesity in Paceville

Expert replies

Previous Topic Next Topic

BTGmoderatorDC: Moderator; Posts: 7187; Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 4:43 pmFollowed by: 23 members

by BTGmoderatorDC » Fri Aug 09, 2019 4:29 pm

Timer

00:00

Your answer

Difficulty–

right wrong

Pick an answer to see how members did

School official: The rate of childhood obesity in Paceville has decreased by 50% in the last five years, whereas the rate of childhood obesity in Aratown has increased by 50% in the same time period. Children in the town of Paceville are obviously much less likely to be obese than are children in Aratown.

This argument fails to consider which of the following questions?

A. How many children were obese in Paceville and Aratown five years ago?

B. Were rates of childhood obesity in Paceville higher than those in Aratown five years ago?

C. Has there been any migration between Paceville and Aratown in the last five years?

D. What were the rates of childhood obesity in Paceville and Aratown five years ago?

E. What percent of children are likely to remain obese for five years or more?

OA D

Source: Veritas Prep

Source: Beat The GMAT — Critical Reasoning | Fri Aug 09, 2019 4:29 pm

deloitte247: Legendary Member; Posts: 2214; Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:22 pmFollowed by: 5 members

by deloitte247 » Sun Aug 18, 2019 10:15 am

We need to find a vital point that seems to have been omitted in the argument.
Premise:
- In the last 5 years, the rate of childhood obesity in Paceville has decreased by 50%.
- It increased by 50% in Aratown

OPTION A - INCORRECT
The argument devised this through the use of percentage to quantify the number of children obese in both towns five years ago.

OPTION B - INCORRECT
The answer to this question has been provided in the argument by claiming that Paceville's rate of child obesity decreased by 50%.

OPTION C - INCORRECT
This doesn't seem like something the argument failed to consider. The argument made no reference to migration between the two towns in question.

OPTION D - CORRECT
It is important to know whether the rate of child obesity increased or reduced in the two towns, by stating what the rate was five years ago, which the argument obviously omitted.

OPTION E - INCORRECT
The argument is not concerned about the percentage of children who will remain obese for the next five years or more.

Featured schoolRound 2 closes Jan 7, 2027 64 days left

Chicago Booth

Since 1982, 10 Booth faculty members have received the Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences, more than any other business school.

#3
U.S. News rank: $175,000
Median base salary: 670
Average GMAT Focus: 635
Students in the class

Apply to Booth Visit chicagobooth.edu See the full profile

Photo: Warren LeMay, CC BY-SA 2.0

GMAT Course Reviews

563 reviews

1168 reviews

431 reviews

359 reviews

147 reviews

5/5

5 Star (563 Reviews)

"Target Test Prep is the closest to the official version of the GMAT exam, about 99% accuracy in terms of the quality and quantity of information. The course has excellently created singular sets of focused lessons and tests for every possible topic that one could come across in the official GMAT exam."

"The TTP course maximizes the efficiency of the time you spend studying. It will take time and effort but I could almost guarantee that if you complete the course exactly as it is laid out you will get an amazing score. They also have a very responsive team willing to help with any questions you might have."

"TTP has two things that I think no other test prep company offers: A teaching approach that reinforces understanding and an attitude that will give you the mental preparedness needed to succeed on the test. TTP gives you a deep understanding of the concept you need to know while teaching you how to think."

Write a Review