BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

SC: use of evidence

Expert replies
by stop@800 » Sat Sep 20, 2008 11:24 am
A recent study of ancient clay deposits has provided new evidence supporting the theory of global forest fires ignited by a meteorite impact that contributed to the extinction of the dinosaurs and many other creatures some 65 million years ago.
1. supporting the theory of global forest fires ignited by a meteorite impact that
2. supporting the theory that global forest fires ignited by a meteorite impact
3. that supports the theory of global forest fires that were ignited by a meteorite impact and that
4. in support of the theory that global forest fires were ignited by a meteorite impact and that
5. of support for the theory of a meteorite impact that ignited global forest fires and

Please give me reason for eliminating / selecting each answer choice.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Re: SC: use of evidence

by mastbombay » Sun Sep 21, 2008 8:40 am
Hi stop,


See , This sentence has more to do with the style.
First of all, we need to understand that new evidence has provided the support for the theory ..... and yes theory is not of global forest fires....... but theory says that global fores fires contributed to the extinction.......

Once we identify the correct meaning, we can eliminate A C and E .. for distorting the meaning...

Now if you read D, the construction........

in support of the theory that........X.......and that...........Y.
wrognly compares X and Y suggesting that both X AND Y are two separate theories........

In fact, both X and Y ARE parts of one theory........

This fact is correctly stated in B
stop@800 wrote:A recent study of ancient clay deposits has provided new evidence supporting the theory of global forest fires ignited by a meteorite impact that contributed to the extinction of the dinosaurs and many other creatures some 65 million years ago.
1. supporting the theory of global forest fires ignited by a meteorite impact that
2. supporting the theory that global forest fires ignited by a meteorite impact
3. that supports the theory of global forest fires that were ignited by a meteorite impact and that
4. in support of the theory that global forest fires were ignited by a meteorite impact and that
5. of support for the theory of a meteorite impact that ignited global forest fires and

Please give me reason for eliminating / selecting each answer choice.
Join the discussion

by stop@800 » Sun Sep 21, 2008 11:05 am
I got the point.
Thanks a lot mastbombay.
Join the discussion

by NSNguyen » Wed Sep 24, 2008 2:06 am
1. supporting the theory of global forest fires ignited by a meteorite impact that
2. supporting the theory that global forest fires ignited by a meteorite impact - change the meaning - this express the theory cause dinosaur extiontion, not meteorite impact
3. that supports the theory of global forest fires that were ignited by a meteorite impact and that (change the meaning forest cause dinosaur extinction
4. in support of the theory that global forest fires were ignited by a meteorite impact and that (like 2)
5. of support for the theory of a meteorite impact that ignited global forest fires and (that)
miss "that" ( and that ....)
Please share your idea and your reasoning :D
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1