BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

SC --Travelers vs Inspectors

Expert replies
by Chaitanya_1986 » Wed May 04, 2011 4:09 am
No matter how patiently they explain their reasons for confiscating certain items, travelers often treat customs inspectors like wanton poachers rather than government employees.
(A) travelers often treat customs inspectors like wanton poachers rather than government employees
(B) travelers often treat customs inspectors as wanton poachers instead of government employees
(C) travelers often treat customs inspectors as if they were not government employees but wanton poachers
(D) customs inspectors are often treated by travelers as if they were wanton poachers rather than government employees
(E) customs inspectors are often treated not like government employees but wanton poachers by travelers


OA is D

MY approach :-

Since opening modifier tells us about the Customs Inspectors not travelers, this leaves us with D and E. In D the usage "They" thought like it may refer to either travels or inspectors.... E is also seems wrong for me because "as" is missing after BUT....


So any one explain me how D can be correct here????

Could any see any thing other than this?
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by VivianKerr » Wed May 04, 2011 6:36 am
The main error here is one of modification. An opening clause describing an action with a comma at the end of it must be immediately followed by the person or thing DOING the action.

"No matter how patiently they explain their reasons for confiscating certain items," is the opening clause here. We can ask, who is logically doing the "confiscating"? It wouldn't be the travelers, since it's illogical that they would confiscate their own belongings.

Based on this logic alone, we can eliminate A, B, and C.

For E, there are several issues. "By travelers" is far from its verb "treated" and has faulty parallelism. Since the first part of the idiom begins with "like", we would want "like" to follow the word "but" as well.

That is why it is D.
Vivian Kerr
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles

Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]

Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"! :-)
Join the discussion

by atulmangal » Wed May 04, 2011 8:06 am
@VivianKerr

Thanks for your post...i agree that Op D is better than Op E...but just one question: the use of THEY in Op D....here i agree that meaningfully THEY should refer to CUSTOM INSPECTORS but still the word TRAVELERS is also there...so should we consider this correct??? Actually i have seen so many questions where people have different views about pronoun ambiguity...some say that Op D is ambiguous and some like me believe that until unless the meaning is clear...pronoun is okay...i believe ambiguity should come in cases like this: Example

John told his friend that he had won the election.

In this case i believe pronoun HE is ambiguous but not in Op D...please suggest m i thinking in right direction????
Last edited by atulmangal on Thu May 05, 2011 2:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by Chaitanya_1986 » Wed May 04, 2011 8:23 am
I know that pronoun ambiguity error will not come if we are using the pronoun correctly in Subject and object positions to the referent. But in this question the usage of THEY is in If clause...So is this still valid???
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Wed May 04, 2011 8:28 am
VivianKerr wrote:The main error here is one of modification. An opening clause describing an action with a comma at the end of it must be immediately followed by the person or thing DOING the action.

"No matter how patiently they explain their reasons for confiscating certain items," is the opening clause here. We can ask, who is logically doing the "confiscating"? It wouldn't be the travelers, since it's illogical that they would confiscate their own belongings.

Based on this logic alone, we can eliminate A, B, and C.

For E, there are several issues. "By travelers" is far from its verb "treated" and has faulty parallelism. Since the first part of the idiom begins with "like", we would want "like" to follow the word "but" as well.

That is why it is D.
Hi Vivian what do you feel about chaitanya_1986's reason for eliminating E
E is also seems wrong for me because "as" is missing after BUT....
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion

by apex231 » Wed May 04, 2011 6:06 pm
Good point, even I have the same doubt..how can we be sure which one is the right option?
atulmangal wrote:@VivianKerr

Thanks for your post...i agree that Op D is better than Op E...but just one question: the use of THEY in Op D....here i agree that meaningfully THEY should refer to CUSTOM INSPECTORS but still the word TRAVELERS is also there...so should we consider this correct??? Actually i have seen so many questions where people have different views about pronoun ambiguity...some say that Op D is ambiguous and some like me believe that until unless the meaning is clear...pronoun is okay...i believe ambiguity should come in cases like this: Example

John told his friend that he had won the election.

In this case i believe JOHN is ambiguous not in Op D...please suggest m i thinking in right direction????
Join the discussion

by VivianKerr » Wed May 04, 2011 7:19 pm
That's a really good question. I think it all comes down to context. For pronoun ambiguity issues, it's usually quite apparent if there is an ambiguous pronoun. In the context of (D), there is no confusion regarding who "they" are since in context "treated as if" is idiomatically correct. If the prepositional phrase "by travelers" was omitted, the sentence would still make sense.
Vivian Kerr
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles

Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]

Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"! :-)
Join the discussion

by EducationAisle » Wed May 04, 2011 9:21 pm
Chaitanya_1986 wrote:I know that pronoun ambiguity error will not come if we are using the pronoun correctly in Subject and object positions to the referent.
Correct.

Chaitanya_1986 wrote:But in this question the usage of THEY is in If clause...So is this still valid???

Why not? A clause is a clause is a clause. How/why should it be any different if it is in the 'if' clause? Let's take a simpler example:

Children would attend the parties only if they are invited.

'they' can refer to parties and children, but both - 'grammatically (structurally)' and 'logically', 'they' is referring to 'children' and is hence correct.
Ashish
MBA - ISB, GMAT - 99th Percentile
GMAT Faculty @ EducationAisle
www.EducationAisle.com

Sentence Correction Nirvana available at:

a) Amazon: Sentence Correction Nirvana

b) Flipkart: Sentence Correction Nirvana

Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi
Join the discussion

by Chaitanya_1986 » Thu May 05, 2011 2:27 am
Thanks Asish....So, i went directly by rules and got caught....Now i got the point that rules are rules that should be used in line with grammatical and logical usage......
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1