BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

SC-- Tenses

Expert replies
by nadib002 » Wed Feb 09, 2011 2:56 pm
I was reading "The Economist" earlier and came across the following sentence.

"Earlier today, it had been announced by the South that they had agreed in principle to begin discussions on reunions for separated families."


When I read the sentence I could figure that the sentence was about two different events:

Event 1-- South agreed in principle

Event 2-- The announcement

I anticipated the verbs to be in "Past Perfect" tense since one event follows the other and both occurred in the past( earlier today)

None of the events is in the "simple past" form ? [ had been announced -- had agreed]

Why is that so? Is my understanding correct or am i missing something?

Could you please clarify?

Thank you
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by nadib002 » Thu Feb 10, 2011 9:55 am
Can someone please reply to my question?

Can Experts please reply?

Thank you
Join the discussion

by jk2010 » Thu Feb 10, 2011 1:32 pm
I am no expert, but that sentence seems poorly written. I had to read it and re-write it in my head to say -

"Earlier today, the South announced that they had agreed in principle to begin discussing the reunions of separated families."

Subject - the South (assuming a group of southern people)

Verb - announced

Object - "that they had agreed" -- They had agreed is past perfect, because the agreement took place prior to the announcement

The original sentence is not clear. For example, "it had been announced by the South" is the passive voice version of "the South announced." It could also be the past perfect progressive stating that there was an announcement and the announcement continued until something else happened. Of course, that makes no sense.

Overall, that is a poorly written sentence in my opinion.
Join the discussion

by hja379 » Thu Feb 10, 2011 3:08 pm
nadib002 wrote:I was reading "The Economist" earlier and came across the following sentence.

"Earlier today, it had been announced by the South that they had agreed in principle to begin discussions on reunions for separated families."


When I read the sentence I could figure that the sentence was about two different events:

Event 1-- South agreed in principle

Event 2-- The announcement

I anticipated the verbs to be in "Past Perfect" tense since one event follows the other and both occurred in the past( earlier today)

None of the events is in the "simple past" form ? [ had been announced -- had agreed]

Why is that so? Is my understanding correct or am i missing something?

Could you please clarify?

Thank you
"it had been announced" - passive voice (not GMAT friendly), unnecessary use of past perfect continuous tense.

If you take the sentence without the context, there is also a clear pronoun-antecedent error (it & they).
'the South' seems to be a collective noun and should be in singular form.

I am no expert, but I think it could be re-written as:

Earlier today, the South announced that it had agreed in principle to begin discussing the reunions of separated families.

Timeline:
had agreed (took place before the announcement was made) --> announced (simple past)
Join the discussion

by jk2010 » Thu Feb 10, 2011 3:27 pm
'the South' seems to be a collective noun and should be in singular form.
Good catch hja379! I missed that when I re-wrote the sentence.
Join the discussion

by gmat.760 » Thu Feb 10, 2011 4:04 pm
I think "Had agreed" is wrong in this context. If you have two events in the past then you may need past perfect to say what happened first, and what happened next.

Present perfect might suit better "Has agreed".
Join the discussion

by hja379 » Thu Feb 10, 2011 5:01 pm
gmat.760 wrote:I think "Had agreed" is wrong in this context. If you have two events in the past then you may need past perfect to say what happened first, and what happened next.

Present perfect might suit better "Has agreed".
Present perfect should be used when the action happened in the past and the effect still continues into present and that does not have a clear timeline.
https://www.englishpage.com/verbpage/presentperfect.html

Though "Earlier today" is a marker that indicates one thing happened in the past, it does not explicitly say when the agreement has been made. Since the two actions are not independent of each other, I still think it should be 'had agreed'.
Join the discussion

by Jim@Grockit » Sun Feb 13, 2011 8:31 pm
Did the sentence before or after that one contain a simple past? We never get multiple sentences in context on SC, but that could make sense of the past perfect there, for additional contrast with sentences in the simple past around it.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1