BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

sc

Expert replies
by ketkoag » Wed Jun 17, 2009 6:25 am
According to Herbert Essame, Patton might have accomplished more had he not been held in check by his superiors, Alexander in the Mediterranean and Eisenhower n Europe.

(A) had he not been held in check by his superiors
(B) had his superiors not held him in check
(C) if his superiors had not held him in check
(D) if he was not held in check by his superiors
(E) when not held in check by his superiors

please elaborate ur answer
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by rahulg83 » Wed Jun 17, 2009 6:58 am
IMO A, the part after comma 'Alexander...' modifies superiors, so we can keep B and C aside. D -> incorrect usage of verb. This statement represents as action that continued till some time, and because of than Patton couldn't accomplish much, E -> awkward
Join the discussion

by mittalashwani13 » Wed Jun 17, 2009 7:01 am
B&C are ruled out immediately because Alexander needs to follow superiors ... so these two introduce Misplaced modifier errors

E is out because of when

Between A & D ... A is right ...

D - it is a simple past tense ...which means activity was happened only once in the past ...but two instances are already given in the sentence of the past....

IMO A
Join the discussion

by walker » Wed Jun 17, 2009 7:08 am
The succeding sentence has Noun Alex and ...

So the underline sentence should end with somthing which should point to the succeeding noun.

So A , D ,E remains

E - when is used only with "time"

D - if should be used when
1) subjunctive
2) ondition if x then y

So A wins
Join the discussion

IMO

by kc_raj » Wed Jun 17, 2009 7:17 am
IMO between A, and D,

It should be D,

because, in A had he not been held (is in passive voice)

have accompalished is present perfect, so past tense should be fine in, if he was not held
Join the discussion

by gums » Wed Jun 17, 2009 8:07 am
I think there are 2 actions here, he might have accomplished more and held in check . accomplished more is the later action and held in check is the first action. So past perfect tense is suitable despite the passive voice. Will go with A.
Join the discussion

by commit.gmat » Wed Jun 17, 2009 10:36 am
(A) had he not been held in check by his superiors

this correctly implies the continuity that he was held in check for a long time

Ex: Federer would have won French Open earlier had he not been held in check by his challenger, Nadal.

Here we mean that he was held in check for a long time.

(B) had his superiors not held him in check
this is clearly out for reason explained by others.

(C) if his superiors had not held him in check
this is clearly out for reason explained by others.

(D) if he was not held in check by his superiors
it implies that he was held in check ONCE.

Ex: Federer would have won French Open earlier if he was not held in check by his challenger, Nadal.

Here it means that he was held in check once.


(E) when not held in check by his superiors
what is 'when' doing here?
Join the discussion

by goelmohit2002 » Wed Jun 17, 2009 12:32 pm
between "A" and "D"...

IMO in "D"....we need if...he were....

since this is a hypothetical case...so if...he....was is wrong....
Join the discussion

by commit.gmat » Wed Jun 17, 2009 12:37 pm
goelmohit2002 wrote:between "A" and "D"...

IMO in "D"....we need if...he were....

since this is a hypothetical case...so if...he....was is wrong....

Applaud !!!
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1