BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

SC Question

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 5:28 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 1 times
by anubhavgulati » Mon Oct 10, 2011 10:49 am
Question.

Marc Murphy, the chef and an owner of the Landmarc restaurants in Manhattan, is roasting turkey breasts in one oven while he braises the legs in the other.

A. the chef and an owner of the Landmarc restaurants in Manhattan, is roasting turkey breasts in one oven while he braises the legs in the other
B. Landmarc restaurants' chef and owner in Manhattan, roasts turkey breasts in one oven while braising the legs in another
C. the chef and an owner of the Landmarc restaurants in Manhattan, roast turkey breasts in one oven while braising the leg in another
D. the chef and an owner of the Landmarc restaurants of Manhattan, roasted turkey breasts in one oven while braising the legs in another
E. the chef and an owner of the Landmarc restaurants in Manhattan, roasts turkey breasts in one oven while braising the legs in another

OA is E, I have successfully eliminated choices B,C and D, but not able to remove choice A.
Can someone please let me know what's wrong in A.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 139
Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 11:06 pm
Thanked: 4 times
GMAT Score:710

by badpoem » Mon Oct 10, 2011 10:57 am
Parallelism, I fear.

the chef and an owner of the Landmarc restaurants in Manhattan, is roasting turkey breasts in one oven while he braises the legs in the other

The parts in bold are NOT parallel although connected with "while".

E on the other hand does just that.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 5:28 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 1 times

by anubhavgulati » Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:01 am
I didn't get it, how E follows parallelism ( roasts and braising).
May be I am missing something..can u pls tell.
badpoem wrote:Parallelism, I fear.

the chef and an owner of the Landmarc restaurants in Manhattan, is roasting turkey breasts in one oven while he braises the legs in the other

The parts in bold are NOT parallel although connected with "while".

E on the other hand does just that.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 139
Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 11:06 pm
Thanked: 4 times
GMAT Score:710

by badpoem » Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:18 am
My mistake. I did not even look at E and presumed that it must be parallel. I take back my previous explanation.

E --> the chef and an owner of the Landmarc restaurants in Manhattan, roasts turkey breasts in one oven while braising the legs in another

The part in bold is a clause that describes what the chef does when he roasts turkey breasts.

A --> the chef and an owner of the Landmarc restaurants in Manhattan, is roasting turkey breasts in one oven while he braises the legs in the other

The part in bold makes it a present continuous sentence and the part after while does not fit, because that is a general statement [simple present tense]


Say for example: He often goes to the market, taking his son along with. [taking his son --> clause that describes an action that happens along with the man going to the market]

But, He is going to the market, takes his son along with --> sounds absurd and is also not parallel. This sentence would be right if it were --> He is going to the market and is taking his son along with.

I hope this helps and apologies for my previous explanation.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 5:28 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 1 times

by anubhavgulati » Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:32 am
Still Some confusion :( , In answer choice E , how the two are parallel, roasts (in simple present tense) and braising (continuous tense)).
badpoem wrote:My mistake. I did not even look at E and presumed that it must be parallel. I take back my previous explanation.

E --> the chef and an owner of the Landmarc restaurants in Manhattan, roasts turkey breasts in one oven while braising the legs in another

The part in bold is a clause that describes what the chef does when he roasts turkey breasts.

A --> the chef and an owner of the Landmarc restaurants in Manhattan, is roasting turkey breasts in one oven while he braises the legs in the other

The part in bold makes it a present continuous sentence and the part after while does not fit, because that is a general statement [simple present tense]


Say for example: He often goes to the market, taking his son along with. [taking his son --> clause that describes an action that happens along with the man going to the market]

But, He is going to the market, takes his son along with --> sounds absurd and is also not parallel. This sentence would be right if it were --> He is going to the market and is taking his son along with.

I hope this helps and apologies for my previous explanation.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 139
Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 11:06 pm
Thanked: 4 times
GMAT Score:710

by badpoem » Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:39 am
anubhavgulati wrote:Still Some confusion :( , In answer choice E , how the two are parallel, roasts (in simple present tense) and braising (continuous tense)).
badpoem wrote:My mistake. I did not even look at E and presumed that it must be parallel. I take back my previous explanation.

E --> the chef and an owner of the Landmarc restaurants in Manhattan, roasts turkey breasts in one oven while braising the legs in another

The part in bold is a clause that describes what the chef does when he roasts turkey breasts. I have tried to illustrate the use of a clause in a sentence through a crude example in italics below. The sentence describes two actions at the same time. A simple tense that is connected to the other action with the help of a present continuous tense.

A --> the chef and an owner of the Landmarc restaurants in Manhattan, is roasting turkey breasts in one oven while he braises the legs in the other

The part in bold makes it a present continuous sentence and the part after while does not fit, because that is a general statement [simple present tense]


Say for example: He often goes to the market, taking his son along with. [taking his son --> clause that describes an action that happens along with the man going to the market]

But, He is going to the market, takes his son along with --> sounds absurd and is also not parallel. This sentence would be right if it were --> He is going to the market and is taking his son along with.

I hope this helps and apologies for my previous explanation.
It is NOT parallel.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 5:28 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 1 times

by anubhavgulati » Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:48 am
Thank you very much.
badpoem wrote:
anubhavgulati wrote:Still Some confusion :( , In answer choice E , how the two are parallel, roasts (in simple present tense) and braising (continuous tense)).
badpoem wrote:My mistake. I did not even look at E and presumed that it must be parallel. I take back my previous explanation.

E --> the chef and an owner of the Landmarc restaurants in Manhattan, roasts turkey breasts in one oven while braising the legs in another

The part in bold is a clause that describes what the chef does when he roasts turkey breasts. I have tried to illustrate the use of a clause in a sentence through a crude example in italics below. The sentence describes two actions at the same time. A simple tense that is connected to the other action with the help of a present continuous tense.

A --> the chef and an owner of the Landmarc restaurants in Manhattan, is roasting turkey breasts in one oven while he braises the legs in the other

The part in bold makes it a present continuous sentence and the part after while does not fit, because that is a general statement [simple present tense]


Say for example: He often goes to the market, taking his son along with. [taking his son --> clause that describes an action that happens along with the man going to the market]

But, He is going to the market, takes his son along with --> sounds absurd and is also not parallel. This sentence would be right if it were --> He is going to the market and is taking his son along with.

I hope this helps and apologies for my previous explanation.
It is NOT parallel.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1