BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Sc question...kindly provide explanation

Expert replies
by RaviKiran » Tue Sep 21, 2010 6:24 am
140.As the housing affordability gap widens, middle-income families are especially hard-hit, and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and rising rental rates force them to use far more than the standard 25 percent of their incomes for housing, leaving them with no equity or tax write-offs to offset the expenditures.

(A) and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and
(B) since these families can no longer afford to buy homes, furthermore
(C) for these families can no longer afford to buy homes, yet
(D) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes; however
(E) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes, for

the answer was mentioned as C. I picked B...... However, I am unable to get the reason why not B and why C.
Can anyone clarify about these structural signposts (however, yet, furthermore) when to use and when not to use...
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by uwhusky » Tue Sep 21, 2010 6:54 am
One reason to choose C over B is that "yet" is a conjunction, "furthermore" is only an adverb.
Yep.
Join the discussion

by gmatrix » Tue Sep 21, 2010 7:19 am
However, I am unable to get the reason why not B and why C.
Can anyone clarify about these structural signposts (however, yet, furthermore) when to use and when not to use...
hi........
Yet & However-are counter premise indicators....they signal a contrast/shift from an earlier stated idea/opinion/fact etc
Furthermore-just adds too an idea....supports it...usually its non-essential piece of an argument.

as for choice C......yet correctly signals the shift/contrast.....they are hard hit...can no longer qualify to buy homes...yet are forced to spend more than the standard 25 percent of their incomes for housing

maybe an expert can weigh in here with his/her thoughts.......
Life is all about ass; you're either covering it, laughing it off, kicking it, kissing it, busting it, trying to get a piece of it, or behaving like one.
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Tue Sep 21, 2010 8:01 am
I agree with both the posts above.

I have a query here:

"rising rental rates force them to use far more than the standard 25 percent of their incomes for housing"

Is this an Independent clause?
"Once you start working on something,
don't be afraid of failure and don't abandon it.
People who work sincerely are the happiest."
Chanakya quotes (Indian politician, strategist and writer, 350 BC-275BC)
Join the discussion

by niksworth » Tue Sep 21, 2010 8:13 am
kvcpk wrote:I agree with both the posts above.

I have a query here:

"rising rental rates force them to use far more than the standard 25 percent of their incomes for housing"

Is this an Independent clause?
I think yes.

Subject - rising rental rates
Verb - force
scio me nihil scire
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Tue Sep 21, 2010 8:23 am
niksworth wrote: I think yes.

Subject - rising rental rates
Verb - force
Thanks Niksworth.

I think in that case answer to this question can be derived another way too. 2 independent clauses can only be combined using FANBOYS (For,And,Not,But,Or,Yet,So)
So, we can eliminate all but A and C.

Since the context is speaking about 2 related events and not 2 different events, AND cannot be used.

pick C.
"Once you start working on something,
don't be afraid of failure and don't abandon it.
People who work sincerely are the happiest."
Chanakya quotes (Indian politician, strategist and writer, 350 BC-275BC)
Join the discussion

by niksworth » Tue Sep 21, 2010 9:13 am
That was a good spot.
scio me nihil scire
Join the discussion

by ankurmit » Thu Sep 23, 2010 4:27 am
I agree that 2 independent clauses can only be combined using FANBOYS (For,And,Not,But,Or,Yet,So)

But I am not convinced with the use of " YET"

Here contrast is not required


they are hard hit...can no longer qualify to buy homes....... .........are forced to spend more than the standard 25 percent of their incomes for housing, leaving them with no equity or tax write-offs to offset the expenditures.

We are just adding something that is supporting that idea..Yet can be used to join two independent clauses that contrast each other.

Here the two clauses are supporting each other.

Please clarify
--------
Ankur mittal
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1