BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

SC -Q- restrictive clause

Expert replies
by Chinn_asama » Sun Aug 11, 2013 9:13 pm
Hi there

Here is a sentence from a Project syndicate article.

"central bankers focused single-mindedly on price stability, though the costs of somewhat higher inflation would have been miniscule compared to the havoc wrought by the financial excesses that they allowed, if not encouraged."

Why is there a comma before the subordinate conjunction 'though'?

Is it because it is not a restrictive clause. can anyone explain the concept of restrictive and non restrictive clauses?

Regards
chinna
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by sameerballani » Sun Aug 11, 2013 10:47 pm
Chinn_asama wrote:Hi there

Here is a sentence from a Project syndicate article.

"central bankers focused single-mindedly on price stability, though the costs of somewhat higher inflation would have been miniscule compared to the havoc wrought by the financial excesses that they allowed, if not encouraged."

Why is there a comma before the subordinate conjunction 'though'?

Is it because it is not a restrictive clause. can anyone explain the concept of restrictive and non restrictive clauses?

Regards
chinna
Read it as :

ALTHOUGH the costs of somewhat higher inflation would have been miniscule compared to the havoc wrought by the financial excesses that they allowed, if not encouraged, central bankers focused single-mindedly on price stability.

This sentence focuses on the contrasting nature of 2 clauses :
1)The costs of somewhat higher inflation would have been miniscule compared to the havoc wrought by the financial excesses that they allowed, if not encouraged.
STILL
2)Central bankers focused single-mindedly on price stability
If my post was helpful, then please click "Thank".
Join the discussion

by Chinn_asama » Mon Aug 12, 2013 8:33 am
Hi there

I read somewhere that a comma does not go before a subordinate conjunction. that's why the Q.

Thanks
Join the discussion

by sameerballani » Mon Aug 12, 2013 9:45 am
Chinn_asama wrote:Hi there

I read somewhere that a comma does not go before a subordinate conjunction. that's why the Q.

Thanks
I disagree.. I believe its actually the comma which decides whether the clause is restricitive/essential or non-restrictive/non-essential.

Eg:
1) The house THAT is painted red belongs to Sam.
THAT is attached to house without any comma.
The meaning of this sentence is that: Out of all the houses, ONLY the one which is of red color belongs to Sam.

2) This house, which is painted red, belongs to Sam.
The phrase starting with WHICH is attached to House, however it is enclosed within commas. This depicts it is NON-ESSENTIAL and generally brings ADDITIONAL INFO.
The meaning of this sentence is: This house belongs to Sam.
"WHICH IS PAINTED RED": gives additional info about THIS HOUSE.

I hope this helps !!
If my post was helpful, then please click "Thank".
Join the discussion

by Chinn_asama » Wed Aug 14, 2013 9:40 am
Hi there

Here is a general Q about 'that' usage. Whenever I see 'that' in sentences, I get confused thinking if it is a indirect speech sentence or just a reporter writing in past tense. Could you please explain little about it.

Thanks
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1