BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

SC: Q 17, Test#17,Paper based test by GMAC (disclosed editio

Expert replies
by manishhemnani » Thu Apr 26, 2007 12:24 pm
Concerned at the increase in accident fatalities, Tennesse adopted a child-passenger protection law requiring the parents of children under four years of age to be restrained in a child safety seat.

A. parents of children under four years of age to be restrained in a child safety seat
B. the restraint of parents of children under four years of age in a child safety seat
C. that parents restrain children under four years of age in a child safety seat
D. that children be restrained under four years of age in a child safety seat by their parents.
E. children to be restrained under four years of age by their parents in a child safety seat

The correct answer is C but i think it's wrong as the option starts with 'that' after 'the' which sounds awkward. I didn't find any answer as correct answer.

Please share your views.

Thanks a ton!
When the GOING gets TOUGH, the TOUGH gets GOING
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by ldoolitt » Mon Apr 30, 2007 10:41 am
That seems odd. Are you sure that 'the' before 'parents' isn't included in the underlined section? If it was this would make more sense.
Join the discussion

by manishhemnani » Mon Apr 30, 2007 12:23 pm
No, it's not underlined. That's a mistake i guess. Should have been underlined.
When the GOING gets TOUGH, the TOUGH gets GOING
Join the discussion

by bhumika.k.shah » Wed Feb 10, 2010 8:16 am
requiring that is a proper idiom here.

E.option E doesnt make any sense. requiring children to be restrained under four years of age...example of misplaced modifiers. it means parents in a child safety seat

D. D states that a law is required so that children be restrained ??? Thats wrong!

A. A says parents of children be refrained ? Wrong meaning

B. also says the same thing as A.

C is the only one that uses the modifier @ the correct place.

IMO C
:)

manishhemnani wrote:Concerned at the increase in accident fatalities, Tennesse adopted a child-passenger protection law requiring the parents of children under four years of age to be restrained in a child safety seat.

A. parents of children under four years of age to be restrained in a child safety seat
B. the restraint of parents of children under four years of age in a child safety seat
C. that parents restrain children under four years of age in a child safety seat
D. that children be restrained under four years of age in a child safety seat by their parents.
E. children to be restrained under four years of age by their parents in a child safety seat

The correct answer is C but i think it's wrong as the option starts with 'that' after 'the' which sounds awkward. I didn't find any answer as correct answer.

Please share your views.

Thanks a ton!
Join the discussion

by thephoenix » Wed Feb 10, 2010 8:23 am
manishhemnani wrote:Concerned at the increase in accident fatalities, Tennesse adopted a child-passenger protection law requiring the parents of children under four years of age to be restrained in a child safety seat.

A. parents of children under four years of age to be restrained in a child safety seat
B. the restraint of parents of children under four years of age in a child safety seat
C. that parents restrain children under four years of age in a child safety seat
D. that children be restrained under four years of age in a child safety seat by their parents.
E. children to be restrained under four years of age by their parents in a child safety seat

The correct answer is C but i think it's wrong as the option starts with 'that' after 'the' which sounds awkward. I didn't find any answer as correct answer.

Please share your views.

Thanks a ton!
check this link here the is in underlined part
https://www.beatthegmat.com/concerned-at ... 14930.html

a little bit of search always helps!!!!!
Join the discussion

by mgmt_gmat » Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:00 am
IMO (C)..

all are passive and in (B) the restrain of.. is awkward.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1