BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

SC: Pronoun doubt

Expert replies
by stop@800 » Fri Sep 26, 2008 1:24 pm
Several years ago the diet industry introduced a variety of appetite suppressants, but some of these drugs caused stomach disorders severe enough to have them banned by the Food and Drug Administration.

A stomach disorders severe enough to have them
B stomach disorders that were severe enough so they were
C stomach disorders of such severity so as to be
D such severe stomach disorders that they were
E such severe stomach disorders as to be

The OA D.


Several years ago the diet industry introduced a variety of appetite suppressants, but some of these drugs caused such severe stomach disorders that they were banned by the Food and Drug Administration.

Now I think they can point to drugs or stomach disorders.

if I change this to
Several years ago the diet industry introduced a variety of appetite suppressants, but some of these drugs caused such severe stomach disorders that they were banned by the Food and Drug Administration.


Several years ago the diet industry introduced a variety of appetite suppressants, but some of these drugs caused such severe stomach disorders that they need to be immediately treated.

Both seems correct to come.

Whats the point I am missing?
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Re: SC: Pronoun doubt

by gmat009 » Fri Sep 26, 2008 4:54 pm
stop@800 wrote:Several years ago the diet industry introduced a variety of appetite suppressants, but some of these drugs caused stomach disorders severe enough to have them banned by the Food and Drug Administration.

A stomach disorders severe enough to have them
B stomach disorders that were severe enough so they were
C stomach disorders of such severity so as to be
D such severe stomach disorders that they were
E such severe stomach disorders as to be

The OA D.


Several years ago the diet industry introduced a variety of appetite suppressants, but some of these drugs caused such severe stomach disorders that they were banned by the Food and Drug Administration.

Now I think they can point to drugs or stomach disorders.

if I change this to
Several years ago the diet industry introduced a variety of appetite suppressants, but some of these drugs caused such severe stomach disorders that they were banned by the Food and Drug Administration.


Several years ago the diet industry introduced a variety of appetite suppressants, but some of these drugs caused such severe stomach disorders that they need to be immediately treated.

Both seems correct to come.

Whats the point I am missing?
Pronoun antecedent is something where I make lot of mistakes.
After reading the sentence I picked E and after reading OA I am still confused why D and not E.
According to grammar rule: " A Pronoun always refers to immediate noun" and in this case it is stomach disorders. Then how D is answer.
Join the discussion

by dumb.doofus » Sat Sep 27, 2008 3:27 pm
Well D has everything right.. except the usage of "they".. the only logic that comes to my mind right now is that the FDA cannot ban stomach disorders.. they can only ban drugs.. and so the "they" is referring to drugs.. apart from this can't think of anything..
although I agree that "they" doesn't have a clear referral..
Join the discussion

by stop@800 » Sun Sep 28, 2008 5:46 am
dumb.doofus wrote:Well D has everything right.. except the usage of "they".. the only logic that comes to my mind right now is that the FDA cannot ban stomach disorders.. they can only ban drugs.. and so the "they" is referring to drugs.. apart from this can't think of anything..
although I agree that "they" doesn't have a clear referral..
But can we use these obvious things in the actual questions??
I think NO, what you guys say?
Join the discussion

by Bidisha800 » Sun Sep 28, 2008 11:30 am
what his question is testing is an idiom (such x that y).
Join the discussion

by stop@800 » Sun Sep 28, 2008 12:07 pm
Bidisha800 wrote:what his question is testing is an idiom (such x that y).
I agree, I actually wanted to get my doubt clarified.
Join the discussion

by NSNguyen » Tue Sep 30, 2008 7:02 am
Hi All,
can anyone analyse what wrong with E?? 8)
Please share your idea and your reasoning :D
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org
Join the discussion

by anju » Tue Sep 30, 2008 8:54 am
NSNguyen wrote:Hi All,
can anyone analyse what wrong with E?? 8)
the correct idiom is
so X as to be Y
and not such X as to be Y

D uses correct idiom
such X that Y
Join the discussion

by gmatrant » Tue Sep 30, 2008 9:51 am
E comes closest to a correct answer.. though I must admit that not idiomatic. I cannot agree with D due to pronoun mismatch.
Between E and D , E sounds better though...
Join the discussion

by aj5105 » Tue Sep 30, 2008 9:58 am
chose E..
Join the discussion

by codesnooker » Tue Sep 30, 2008 12:35 pm
stop@800 wrote:
Bidisha800 wrote:what his question is testing is an idiom (such x that y).
I agree, I actually wanted to get my doubt clarified.
Hello Stop@800, same doubt I had from long time. After seeing this question, I did some search on various forums. Here are briefings:-

From Manhattan forum:

There is hierarchy of rules to be applied on GMAT questions (in case of pronoun errors):-

1. Check all the answers for pronoun ambiguity.
2. If all the choices have ambiguous pronoun. then go for the pronoun that grammatically parallel to its antecedents.

So, in our case, actually there is no pronoun reference error. WHY?

Because it's construction is something like this:-

Several years ago the diet industry introduced a variety of appetite suppressants, but some of these drugs caused such severe stomach disorders that they were banned by the Food and Drug Administration.


Some of these drugs is the subject of 2nd clause and disorders is OBJECT, not the SUBJECT for 2nd clause. Whereas, THEY is again SUBJECT of 3rd clause.

So as per my understanding, both SUBJECTS are parallel, and THEY can referred as ANTECEDENT of SOME OF THESE DRUGS.
https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/post17383.html

From Gmatclub forum:

It also said the same thing but even in more simpler way. It states that the sentence structure should be like this:

" S+V+such ~ that+S...structure, those two S should be the same. So, "they" here refers to the some of the drugs.

Here, S represents to SUBJECT.
https://gmatclub.com/forum/11-t70455&p=519854

Hope this helps a bit...
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1