BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

SC - housing affordability

Expert replies
by Xbond » Sun Oct 18, 2009 5:55 am
Hi there,

Could you explain to me the reasoning in order to resolve this SC ?

As the housing affordability gap widens, middle-income families are especially hard-hit,and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and rising rental rates force them to use far more than the standard 25 percent of their incomes for housing, leaving them with no equity or tax write-offs to offset the expenditures.
(A) and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and
(B) since these families can no longer afford to buy homes, furthermore
(C) for these families can no longer afford to buy homes, yet
(D) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes; however,
(E) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes, for

Answer is C
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Re: SC - housing affordability

by maihuna » Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:02 am
IMO : E, I am surprised C is answer. I am sure C is wrong.
Xbond wrote: As the housing affordability gap widens, middle-income families are especially hard-hit,and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and rising rental rates force them to use far more than the standard 25 percent of their incomes for housing, leaving them with no equity or tax write-offs to offset the expenditures.
(A) and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and
(B) since these families can no longer afford to buy homes, furthermore
(C) for these families can no longer afford to buy homes, yet
(D) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes; however,
(E) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes, for

Answer is C
Charged up again to beat the beast :)
Join the discussion

by Xbond » Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:08 am
It is the answer from 1000 SC
Join the discussion

Re: SC - housing affordability

by fruti_yum » Sun Oct 18, 2009 1:08 pm
maihuna wrote:IMO : E, I am surprised C is answer. I am sure C is wrong.
Xbond wrote: As the housing affordability gap widens, middle-income families are especially hard-hit,and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and rising rental rates force them to use far more than the standard 25 percent of their incomes for housing, leaving them with no equity or tax write-offs to offset the expenditures.
(A) and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and
(B) since these families can no longer afford to buy homes, furthermore
(C) for these families can no longer afford to buy homes, yet
(D) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes; however,
(E) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes, for

Answer is C
I thought the answer would have been B, since = just evidence and furthermore says that they are still going in the same direction... overall direction has not changed
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Sat Oct 24, 2009 3:30 am
me too...
Join the discussion

by 2010gmat » Sat Oct 24, 2009 9:24 pm
C is correct...it simply says that middle income families are hard hit for {read because} they no longer qualify to buy homes yet they have to spend more than 25% of the income on rentals...
Join the discussion

by heshamelaziry » Sat Oct 24, 2009 9:53 pm
Although it is from 1000 SC, this one is correct. "for" means "because"
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Mon Oct 26, 2009 7:29 pm
Can you explain why please?
heshamelaziry wrote:Although it is from 1000 SC, this one is correct. "for" means "because"
Join the discussion

by umaa » Mon Oct 26, 2009 7:37 pm
Found an explanation from Google.

After having mentioned the "ability to buy a home", we have to mention "the house rents are high too". The latter is an additional problem faced by families. So, a "furthermore" / "yet" / "moreover" / "besides"/"in addition" is required ["yet will have the same meaning as "besides" here].
A is incorrect because "and" doesn't do enough to clearly mention "high rent rates" as an "additional problem".

That leaves us with B and C.
[I hope, I do not need to explain why D and E are incorrect.]

B changes the meaning of the sentence.
B implies : since these families can no longer afford housing - the housing affordability gap widens. [should be the other way round]

Moreover, we don't need a "because" or a "since" here as this is not a cause-effect situation. We need a conjunction instead.
"MIF families are hard hit.. and/for they are unable to afford homes.."
'for' correctly join both sentences.
What we think, we become
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1