BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

SC- doubt - style/ awkardness

Expert replies
by nittinj » Mon Sep 29, 2008 6:57 pm
Like the grassy fields and old pastures that the upland sandpiper needs for feeding and nesting when it returns in May after wintering in the Argentine Pampas, (the sandpipers vanishing in the northeastern United States is a result of residential and industrial development and of changes in) farming practices.

A.the sandpipers vanishing in the northeastern United States is a result of residential and industrial development and of changes in
B.the bird itself is vanishing in the northeastern United States as a result of residential and industrial development and of changes in
C.that the birds themselves are vanishing in the northeastern United States is due to residential and industrial development and changes to
D.in the northeastern United States, sandpipers’ vanishing is due to residential and industrial development and to changes in
E.in the northeastern United States, the sandpipers’ vanishing, a result of residential and industrial development and changing

Is the structure of sentence correct - Like the grassy fields -----comparison shud be smehtng similar which is not appearing in ne other choice
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by dumb.doofus » Mon Sep 29, 2008 7:16 pm
IMO A

maintains ||ism in the use of "is a result of.. and of.. "

in B i find bird itself.. a lil awkward..

I found B the closest option to a correct answer..
Join the discussion

by stop@800 » Tue Sep 30, 2008 3:02 am
Ans is B
its perhaps OG question.
Join the discussion

Re: SC- doubt - style/ awkardness

by perfectstranger » Sat Jun 13, 2009 4:22 am
A.the sandpipers vanishing in the northeastern United States is a result of residential and industrial development and of changes in- Like the grassy fields and old pastures,the sandpipers vanishing is wrong because 1) an apostrophe is needed ‘’sandpipers’ vanishing’’ 2) compares grassy fields and old pastures with sandpipers’ vanishing . Two side must be logically paralel. Out-
B.the bird itself is vanishing in the northeastern United States as a result of residential and industrial development and of changes in- Like the grassy fields and old pastures,the bird itself is vanishing …. compares grassy fields and old pastures with the bird noun-noun comparasion Correct-
C.that the birds themselves are vanishing in the northeastern United States is due to residential and industrial development and changes to- Like the grassy fields and old pastures, that the birds….. ,violates the rule of like Out -
D.in the northeastern United States, sandpipers’ vanishing is due to residential and industrial development and to changes in- Like the grassy fields and old pastures, in the northeastern United States, sandpipers’ vanishing compares grassy fields and old pastures with sandpipers’ vanishing . Two side must be logically paralel. Out
E.in the northeastern United States, the sandpipers’ vanishing, a result of residential and industrial development and changing -Like the grassy fields and old pastures, in the northeastern United States, sandpipers’ vanishing compares grassy fields and old pastures with sandpipers’ vanishing . Two side must be logically paralel. Out



To understand the sentence remove ….that ….. Argentine Pampas and read as Like the grassy fields and old pastures,
Please do not post answers visibly . Please hide them or post them later after the discussion.
Join the discussion

by Beat-D-GMAT » Sun Sep 27, 2009 11:00 am
I did not get this sentence. Fields and pastures are compared with bird...how can we compare two non similar things. Also Manhattan SC guide says always compare similar things.

This questions still not clear at all to me . Can some one please explain it to me?
Join the discussion

by scoobydooby » Sun Sep 27, 2009 11:10 am
grassy fields, pastures are vanishing due to residential and industrial devlopment

sandpipers also are vanishing due to residential and industrial development.

they are similar as they are vanishing due to the same reasons.
Join the discussion

by vivekjaiswal » Tue Dec 01, 2009 3:46 am
perfectstranger wrote:A.the sandpipers vanishing in the northeastern United States is a result of residential and industrial development and of changes in- Like the grassy fields and old pastures,the sandpipers vanishing is wrong because 1) an apostrophe is needed ��sandpipers� vanishing�� 2) compares grassy fields and old pastures with sandpipers� vanishing . Two side must be logically paralel. Out-
B.the bird itself is vanishing in the northeastern United States as a result of residential and industrial development and of changes in- Like the grassy fields and old pastures,the bird itself is vanishing �. compares grassy fields and old pastures with the bird noun-noun comparasion Correct-
C.that the birds themselves are vanishing in the northeastern United States is due to residential and industrial development and changes to- Like the grassy fields and old pastures, that the birds�.. ,violates the rule of like Out -
D.in the northeastern United States, sandpipers� vanishing is due to residential and industrial development and to changes in- Like the grassy fields and old pastures, in the northeastern United States, sandpipers� vanishing compares grassy fields and old pastures with sandpipers� vanishing . Two side must be logically paralel. Out
E.in the northeastern United States, the sandpipers� vanishing, a result of residential and industrial development and changing -Like the grassy fields and old pastures, in the northeastern United States, sandpipers� vanishing compares grassy fields and old pastures with sandpipers� vanishing . Two side must be logically paralel. Out



To understand the sentence remove �.that �.. Argentine Pampas and read as Like the grassy fields and old pastures,
very well explained I must say....but there is one doubt in this.
In option A, why isn't 'the sandpipers' taken as the plural of sandpiper and why is it ruled out because of the missing apostrophe? It is very well possible to address the sandpipers in a plural form and the sentence then sounds correct...any views anyone?

Thanks,
Vivek.
Join the discussion

by viju9162 » Wed Dec 02, 2009 3:02 am
Thanks perfectstranger.
"Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group
Join the discussion

by varundaga05 » Thu Nov 11, 2010 8:53 pm
not clear can someone explain the same.

Grassy Fields and old pastures are compared to the bird. How ?

for option D and E. Sandpipers' vanishing is said to be illogical. How
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1