Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 1 and Nov 21. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 1
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 1 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand5 seats leftStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

SC doubt B 3

Expert replies
by aditya8062 » Fri Dec 11, 2015 6:39 am
The physicist Richard Feynman presented a comprehensive introduction to modern physics designed for undergraduate students in a two-year course.

A. The physicist Richard Feynman presented a comprehensive introduction to modern physics designed for undergraduate students in a two-year course.
B. For undergraduate students, the physicist Richard Feynman presented a two-year course, being a comprehensive introduction to modern physics.
C. A comprehensive introduction was in a two-year course by the physicist Richard Feynman presenting to undergraduate students an introduction to modern physics.
D. Presenting a comprehensive introduction, the physicist Richard Feynman introduced modern physics in a two-year course designed for undergraduate students.
E. In a two-year course designed for undergraduate students, the physicist Richard Feynman presented a comprehensive introduction to modern physics.

my doubt:i feel that in option E the prepositional phrase "In a two-year course designed for undergraduate students" will be adverbial in nature and so i am not able to understand its function in option E

ALSO what makes D wrong

thanks
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Dec 11, 2015 7:10 am
aditya8062 wrote:my doubt:i feel that in option E the prepositional phrase "In a two-year course designed for undergraduate students" will be adverbial in nature and so i am not able to understand its function in option E
E: In a two-year course designed for undergraduate students, the physicist Richard Feynman presented a comprehensive introduction to modern physics.
Here, in a two-year course is an adverb serving to modify presented.
WHERE did Richard Feynman present a comprehensive introduction to modern physics?
He presented it IN A TWO-YEAR COURSE.
ALSO what makes D wrong
In D, introduction and introduced are redundant.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by evs.teja » Mon Dec 21, 2015 12:02 am
E: In a two-year course designed for undergraduate students, the physicist Richard Feynman presented a comprehensive introduction to modern physics.
Here, in a two-year course is an adverb serving to modify presented.
WHERE did Richard Feynman present a comprehensive introduction to modern physics?
He presented it IN A TWO-YEAR COURSE.
Dear GMATGuruNY
I am having a hard time understanding the intended meaning of the sentence not just w.r.t. to this particular sentence but many other times as well. How do you conclude the meaning of a sentence just by reading the question ?
For instance, my comprehension after reading this sentence was "The physicist presented an introduction to modern physics".
What kind of modern physics did he present?
designed for undergraduate students in a two-year course.

This has happened to me in a number of cases where I fail to understand the intended meaning :( . How to curb this ?
Thanks
Teja
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Dec 24, 2015 5:26 am
evs.teja wrote:
E: In a two-year course designed for undergraduate students, the physicist Richard Feynman presented a comprehensive introduction to modern physics.
Here, in a two-year course is an adverb serving to modify presented.
WHERE did Richard Feynman present a comprehensive introduction to modern physics?
He presented it IN A TWO-YEAR COURSE.
Dear GMATGuruNY
I am having a hard time understanding the intended meaning of the sentence not just w.r.t. to this particular sentence but many other times as well. How do you conclude the meaning of a sentence just by reading the question ?
For instance, my comprehension after reading this sentence was "The physicist presented an introduction to modern physics".
What kind of modern physics did he present?
designed for undergraduate students in a two-year course.

This has happened to me in a number of cases where I fail to understand the intended meaning :( . How to curb this ?
Thanks
Teja
A modifier should be AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE to what it modifies.
If a VERBed modifier BEGINS a sentence, it should refer to the FIRST WORD in the main clause.
Otherwise, a VERBed modifier will -- in the vast majority of cases -- IMMEDIATELY FOLLOW the noun that it modifies.
In E, designed immediately follows course, conveying that a COURSE was DESIGNED.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion