BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

SC: Asset Allocation

Expert replies
by camitava » Sun Feb 23, 2014 11:56 pm
Asset allocators create portfolios, often in the form of of mutual funds, with the intention to turn in good results in both "bull" and "bear" markets.
(A) with the intention
(B) the intention of which is
(C) intended
(D) and intending
(E) so intended as
In this SC, I ignored options B,D and E for lengthy, complex and ungrammatical usage. Between A and C, I am stuck. Which option to choose? Because, A is not grammatically wrong. So why did we not select A? By the way, C is the OA. Can any expert help me in understanding the missing difference between A and C.
Correct me If I am wrong


Regards,

Amitava
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Mon Feb 24, 2014 1:02 pm
If you ignore the modifier set off by commas, the difference is more obvious.

Asset allocators create portfolios with the intention to turn in...

Asset allocators create portfolios intended to turn in...

By using a prepositional phrase, A links the intention to turn in good results back to the subject (asset allocators). It's not the allocators that turn in good results, it's the portfolios.

C uses a past participle to clearly refer to the portfolios.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:44 pm

A: Asset allocators create portfolios, often in the form of mutual funds, WITH THE INTENTION to turn in good results in both "bull" and "bear" markets.

C: Asset allocators create portfolios, often in the form of mutual funds, INTENDED to turn in good results in both "bull" and "bear" markets.


Generally, a modifier surrounded by commas is NON-ESSENTIAL and can be removed without changing the basic meaning of the sentence.
In the SC above, often in the form of mutual funds is surrounded by commas thus is NON-ESSENTIAL.
Implication:
The upper case modifiers in A and C refer not to this non-essential phrase but to the preceding CLAUSE (asset allocators create portfolios).

A prepositional modifier can serve as an ADJECTIVE or as an ADVERB.

Answer choice A, case 1: with the intention = ADJECTIVE
PORTFOLIOS WITH THE INTENTION to turn in good results.
No - PORTFOLIOS cannot have an INTENTION.

Answer choice A, case 2: with the intention = ADVERB
Asset allocators CREATE WITH THE INTENTION to turn in good results.
No -- the allocators themselves do not turn in good results; the PORTFOLIOS turn in good results.

Since neither option conveys the intended meaning, eliminate A.

Answer choice C:
Asset allocators create PORTFOLIOS INTENDED to turn in good results.
Here the meaning makes sense: the PORTFOLIOS that the allocators create are INTENDED to turn in good results.

The correct answer is C.

Please also note the following idiom issue: with the intention OF VERBing is typically preferred to with the intention TO + VERB.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by camitava » Mon Feb 24, 2014 10:26 pm
Thanks GMATGURUNY and Bill. I somehow get to know the difference between the two options. Hope this will help me in solving similar problems in SC!
Correct me If I am wrong


Regards,

Amitava
Join the discussion

by Mo2men » Sat Jul 15, 2017 9:27 am
GMATGuruNY wrote: A prepositional modifier can serve as an ADJECTIVE or as an ADVERB.

Answer choice A, case 1: with the intention = ADJECTIVE
PORTFOLIOS WITH THE INTENTION to turn in good results.
No - PORTFOLIOS cannot have an INTENTION.

Answer choice A, case 2: with the intention = ADVERB
Asset allocators CREATE WITH THE INTENTION to turn in good results.
No -- the allocators themselves do not turn in good results; the PORTFOLIOS turn in good results.

Since neither option conveys the intended meaning, eliminate A.
Dear Mitch,

I have a question regarding about in your interpretation of case 2 .

I understood with the intention = ADVERB to as follows:

Assets allecators Create the portfolio as those allecators intend to deliver good results. So they are willing to prodcue good results. Here 'intention' belongs to human beings Not a non-human such 'portfolio' in case 1.

Why is it wrong to understand this way?
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Sun Jul 16, 2017 11:52 am
Mo2men wrote:
GMATGuruNY wrote: A prepositional modifier can serve as an ADJECTIVE or as an ADVERB.

Answer choice A, case 1: with the intention = ADJECTIVE
PORTFOLIOS WITH THE INTENTION to turn in good results.
No - PORTFOLIOS cannot have an INTENTION.

Answer choice A, case 2: with the intention = ADVERB
Asset allocators CREATE WITH THE INTENTION to turn in good results.
No -- the allocators themselves do not turn in good results; the PORTFOLIOS turn in good results.

Since neither option conveys the intended meaning, eliminate A.
Dear Mitch,

I have a question regarding about in your interpretation of case 2 .

I understood with the intention = ADVERB to as follows:

Assets allecators Create the portfolio as those allecators intend to deliver good results. So they are willing to prodcue good results. Here 'intention' belongs to human beings Not a non-human such 'portfolio' in case 1.

Why is it wrong to understand this way?
Case 2 implies that asset allocators want good results in both "bull" and "bear" markets.
This meaning is so obvious that it need not be stated.
OF COURSE asset allocators would like good results in both "bull" and "bear" markets.
The meaning conveyed by the OA is far more logical:
that the PORTFOLIOS created by asset allocators are intended to yield good results.

Regardless, with the intention + TO + VERB is idiomatically suspect.
Correct: with the intention + OF + VERBing.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1