BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

sc 538

Expert replies
by magical cook » Thu May 17, 2007 9:52 pm
538. Not since Galileo suffered the “scurvy humor” of the Inquisition has a religious organization so effectively curbed the ability of a major scientist that he could pursue a theory.
(A) has a religious organization so effectively curbed the ability of a major scientist that he could pursue
(B) did a religious organization so effectively curb the ability of a major scientist that he could pursue
(C) has a religious organization so effectively curbed the ability of a major scientist to pursue
(D) did a religious organization so effectively curb the ability of a major scientist to pursue
(E) has a religious organization so effectively curbed whether a major scientist had the ability that he could be pursuing

Hi,
The answer is C... but I need explation why

1) has to be have PP tense?
2) why to perue is better than "that he could persue"??
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by RAGS » Thu May 17, 2007 10:35 pm
The sentence says that since a time in the past till date no institution has been able to curb scientists. So the action described continues to present hence simple present tense should be used.
Did refers to past tense and the action has not been copleted till date
Hope clarifies the doubt
If It Is To Be It Is Up To Me
Join the discussion

by Cybermusings » Mon May 21, 2007 4:47 am
I think the correct idiom should be not since ....has a ...hence eliminate choice D&B
A is awakward and roundabout
I would root for C....E is also wordy and awkward
Join the discussion

by cjiang16 » Fri Apr 11, 2008 3:58 pm
In my eyes, this is not a good question. Is it from GMAC?
Join the discussion

by madhur_ahuja » Thu Jul 16, 2009 3:09 am
This is from 1000 SC.
Join the discussion

Re: sc 538

by goelmohit2002 » Thu Jul 16, 2009 8:34 am
magical cook wrote:538. Not since Galileo suffered the “scurvy humor” of the Inquisition has a religious organization so effectively curbed the ability of a major scientist that he could pursue a theory.
(A) has a religious organization so effectively curbed the ability of a major scientist that he could pursue
(B) did a religious organization so effectively curb the ability of a major scientist that he could pursue
(C) has a religious organization so effectively curbed the ability of a major scientist to pursue
(D) did a religious organization so effectively curb the ability of a major scientist to pursue
(E) has a religious organization so effectively curbed whether a major scientist had the ability that he could be pursuing

Hi,
The answer is C... but I need explation why

1) has to be have PP tense?
2) why to perue is better than "that he could persue"??
IMO we need since + has.
ability + to.

Only C follows these two.
Join the discussion

by sandy217 » Mon Oct 11, 2010 11:26 pm
" Since" should trigger the use of present perfect, Eliminate B , D
I think "so <Adjective/adjective phrase> that" is correct idiom. But the problem with A is "He" is ambiguous.
It can refer galileo or scientist.

E can be eliminated on the grounds of wordiness ...
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1