BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

SaveAll Stores

Expert replies
by crackgmat007 » Thu May 14, 2009 7:49 pm
Community activist: If Morganville wants to keep its central shopping district healthy, it should prevent the opening of a huge SaveAll discount department store on the outskirts of Morganville. Records from other small towns show that whenever SaveAll has opened a store outside the central shopping district of a small town, within five years the town has experienced the bankruptcies of more than a quarter of the stores in the shopping district.
The answer to which of the following would be most useful for evaluating the community activist’s reasoning?
A. Have community activists in other towns successfully campaigned against the opening of a SaveAll store on the outskirts of their towns?
B. Do a large percentage of the residents of Morganville currently do almost all of their shopping at stores in Morganville?
C. In towns with healthy central shopping districts, what proportion of the stores in those districts suffer bankruptcy during a typical five-year period?
D. What proportion of the employees at the SaveAll store on the outskirts of Morganville will be drawn form Morganville?
E. Do newly opened SaveAll stores ever lose money during their first five years of operation?

IMO - B-->Depending the % of shoppers, impact on the stores at M can be determined.

But the answer seems to be C, can anyone explain why? Tx much
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by PAB2706 » Thu May 14, 2009 11:32 pm
IMO C

The argument puts a complete blame on the discount shops on the outskirts... It assumes that there is no other reason for bankruptcy of district shops.

So answer to C can give us a data for a typical year withou the influence of the discount shops, then the conclusion of the argument can be precisely derived.
Join the discussion

Re: SaveAll Stores

by Minheequang » Fri May 15, 2009 11:30 pm
Yes C

Requirement: To keep central shopping healthy
Action: prevent open of Saveall outside central shopping of town
Reason: in 5 years, more than 1/4 stores in central shopping went bankrupcy
--> Assumption: if in 5 years, more than 1/4 stores in central shopping went bankrupcy --> central shopping stores of town are not healthy

Only C has such relevant information. Others do not
Join the discussion

by sanp_l » Sat May 16, 2009 12:17 am
The activist states a fact that a quarter of stores get closed due to the save all discount department in other small cities with a central shopping district.

Campaigns of other activists in other towns is of no point. Hence not A.

Even if we get the percentage of people doing their shopping from the city, we really don't know what percentage of it shops from save all or from the central district. The case in question is the closure of stores due to the opening of the save all department. Even if 20% of the population shop from the city, then also it might be true that all of them shop from the save all deprtment. In that case too, the normal central stores get effected. Hence not B.

C gives us an answer for the impact the opening of the save all store might have. It will be usefull to evaluate the face when the activist in the passage says that a quarter of stores face bankruptcy.

D and E also dont have any direct impact.

Hence C.

Hope it helps. :)
Sandy
Join the discussion

by crackgmat007 » Mon May 18, 2009 9:49 am
thanks all!!
Join the discussion

by aj5105 » Tue May 19, 2009 9:32 am
To evaluate it's important for us to know what's scene like in healthy shopping district. Based on that data we could access the scene in Morganville.

(C)
Join the discussion

by mason77 » Sun May 15, 2016 2:25 pm
. I also think that the right answer is C.
Join the discussion