BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

sales tax ...weird q

Expert replies
by bignasty666 » Tue Jul 14, 2009 2:59 am
One state adds a 7 percent sales tax to the price of most products purchased within its jurisdiction. This tax, therefore, if viewed as tax on income, has the reverse effect of the federal income tax: the lower the income, the higher the annual percentage rate at which the income is taxed.
The conclusion above would be properly drawn if which of the following were assumed as a premise?
(A) The amount of money citizens spend on products subject to the state tax tends to be equal across income levels.
(B) The federal income tax favors citizens with high incomes, whereas the state sales tax favors citizens with low incomes.
(C) Citizens with low annual incomes can afford to pay a relatively higher percentage of their incomes in state sales tax, since their federal income tax is relatively low.
(D) The lower a state’s sales tax, the more it will tend to redistribute income from the more affluent citizens to the rest of society.
(E) Citizens who fail to earn federally taxable income are also exempt from the state sales tax.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by ssmiles08 » Tue Jul 14, 2009 3:08 am
IMO A.

edit: finally have a chance to write down why I think it is A.

premise: tells us that 7% tax is for everyone, doesn't matter what income level you are in.

conclusion: Says that this is not like the federal income tax where the tax is proportional to your income level. It appears to be the reverse case where the lower income levels seem to have a higher percentage taxed.

A incorporates both the conclusion and the premise by stating that if they spend the same amount of money on products being purchased, it does give off the "optical illusion" that lower income levels have a higher tax rate since it is so drastically different than the Federal Income tax.
Join the discussion

by tohellandback » Tue Jul 14, 2009 5:46 am
IMO A
only if The amount of money citizens spend on products subject to the state tax is equal across all income levels, you can conclude that tax rate is high for low income levels
for ex: lets say everyone from both income levels spend 200 bucks. tax is 14 bucks for both of them
now person with income 10000 bucks is paying only .14%. but a person with income 1000 bucks is paying 1.4%

but if the guy with income 1000 bucks had purchased stuff for 10 bucks only the tax rate would be even lower than .14%
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Tue Jul 14, 2009 1:24 pm
IMO - A
Join the discussion

IMO B

by hariharakarthi » Wed Jul 15, 2009 4:49 am
OA Please.

Why not B?
Join the discussion

by james33 » Sun May 15, 2016 8:16 pm
I believe the answer should be A
Join the discussion