Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Sales PS

Expert replies
by aj5105 » Sun Jul 19, 2009 5:17 am
As a bicycle salesperson, Norman earns a fixed salary of $20 per week plus $6 per bicycle for the first six bicycles he sells, $12 per bicycle for the next six bicycles he sells, and $18 per bicycle for every bicycle sold after the first 12. This week, Norman earned more than twice as much as he did last week. If he sold x bicycles last week and y bicycles this week, which of the following statements must be true?

I. y > 2x

II. y > x

III. y > 3


I only

II only

I and II

II and III

I, II and III

I want to understand how to pick numbers for such questions?
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by ssmiles08 » Sun Jul 19, 2009 6:13 am
I didn't pick numbers. Maybe some one can show how to pick numbers.

From this question stem itself you know that y > x b/c he must have sold greater number of vehicles this week for his revenue to be twice as great.

so (II) is true.

set up the equation. 20 + 6*6 + 12(y-6) + 18(y-12) = This week.

This week = 2*Last week; Last week = x, so this week is 2x

20 + 6*6 + 12(y-6) + 18(y-12) = 2x.

20 + 36 + 12y - 72 + 18y - 216 = 2x.

30y - 232 = 2x

x = 15y - 106.

from the above equation, you can find out that he at least sold 8 more bicycles this week than last week b/c if he sold 7 more, you would get a negative value for x and that is not possible.

(-1) = 15*7 - 106.

14 = 15*8 - 106

Now we know the least amount of vehicles he sold was definitely y > 3

so (III) is also true.

(I) doesn't always have to be true. He makes twice as much not sells twice as much.

IMO D.
You got a dream... You gotta protect it. People can't do somethin' themselves, they wanna tell you you can't do it. If you want somethin', go get it. Period.
Join the discussion

by ithoughtshewas18 » Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:27 am
Its D

You can be easily folled by forgetting about the $20/wk,

If you forgot about that, then A would be true.

As x(2) = 1bike for x = $6.00
Y being 3 , 3(6)=$18

But with the $20/wk

Its $26 and $38

Don't forget to translate X bikes x 6.

B: There is no way y can be smaller than X.

C. Y has to be atleast 4 to get over the half way hump even if X sells 0 bikes the week before.
X = 0 = $20
Y = 4 X 6 = $24.00 + 20 = $44.00
Join the discussion