BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

rusty modifier

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Legendary Member
Posts: 1578
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:49 amFollowed by: 9 members
Thanked: 82 times
GMAT Score:720
by maihuna » Sun Jan 04, 2009 11:49 am
By applying optimization techniques commonly used to plan operations, it is possible to determine how much effort ought to be devoted to each of a company’s products in order to meet its goals in both the short and long terms.
it is possible to determine how much effort ought to be devoted to each of a company’s products in order to meet its goals in both the short and long terms
a company’s managers can determine how much effort should be dedicated to each of the company’s products in order to meet its short and long term goals
it can be determined by company managers how much effort ought to be devoted to each of the company’s products in order to meet its goals, both short and long term
it may be possible for company managers to determine how much effort should be dedicated to each of these products in order to meet the company’s short and long term goals
managers at a company can determine how much effort ought to be dedicated to each of these products in order to meet the company’s goals in both the short and long term
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 424
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Sydney
Thanked: 12 times

Re: rusty modifier

by piyush_nitt » Sun Jan 04, 2009 12:15 pm
maihuna wrote:By applying optimization techniques commonly used to plan operations, it is possible to determine how much effort ought to be devoted to each of a company’s products in order to meet its goals in both the short and long terms.
it is possible to determine how much effort ought to be devoted to each of a company’s products in order to meet its goals in both the short and long terms - Incorrect Modifier
a company’s managers can determine how much effort should be dedicated to each of the company’s products in order to meet its short and long term goals - Correct
it can be determined by company managers how much effort ought to be devoted to each of the company’s products in order to meet its goals, both short and long term - Incorrect Modifier
it may be possible for company managers to determine how much effort should be dedicated to each of these products in order to meet the company’s short and long term goals - Incorrect modifier
managers at a company can determine how much effort ought to be dedicated to each of these products in order to meet the company’s goals in both the short and long term

IMO B
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1578
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:49 amFollowed by: 9 members
Thanked: 82 times
GMAT Score:720

by maihuna » Sun Jan 04, 2009 1:24 pm
OA is B only.

But this modifer dhould have modified Manager rather than a company's manager, whats ur take on this using possessive become opaque.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 546
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 11:00 pm
Location: New Delhi , India
Thanked: 13 times

by ronniecoleman » Sun Jan 04, 2009 9:06 pm
IMO B
Admission champion, Hauz khaz
011-27565856
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1404
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 6:55 pmFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 18 times

by tanviet » Mon Jan 05, 2009 2:34 am
Why E is wrong
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 36 times

by goelmohit2002 » Mon Jan 05, 2009 2:36 am
IMO think of this in the following way:

b) a company’s managers, can determine how much effort should be dedicated to each of the company’s products in order to meet its short and long term goals

a company’s managers, by applying optimization techniques commonly used to plan operations, can determine how much effort should be dedicated to each of the company’s products in order to meet its short and long term goals

The above looks correct. So "B" is the answer.

Rest all have modifier issue. In "d" may and possible together are redundant. Possible itself conveys "May". This may/possible is similar to one question in OG-10.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1