• Free Practice Test & Review
How would you score if you took the GMAT

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 1 Hour Free
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Get 300+ Practice Questions

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Veritas GMAT Class
Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Trial & Practice Exam
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5 Day FREE Trial
Study Smarter, Not Harder

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Magoosh
Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• FREE GMAT Exam
Know how you'd score today for $0 Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Award-winning private GMAT tutoring Register now and save up to$200

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

## Round 1 vs. Round 2

This topic has 8 expert replies and 21 member replies
Goto page
• 1,
• 2

### GMAT/MBA Expert

Joined
26 Apr 2006
Posted:
1049 messages
Followed by:
113 members
50

#### Round 1 vs. Round 2

Thu Sep 07, 2006 10:15 am
Most applicants that contact me assume that Round 1 is the best time to apply and will kill themselves to submit all apps in Round 1 for their target schools. My work with clients throughout the years does not in any way support the idea that Round 1 is better. I have seen equal success rates for both rounds. Despite that, my clients are so convinced that Round 1 is the key to success, that I decided to conduct an informal survey with admissions committee members at several top schools. The findings: there is no evidence that round 1 is better than round 2!

Some specific feedback:
- In R2 we are more likely to take risks on less ideal candidates
- There may be a slightly higher success rate for R1 candudates but we attribute that to the fact that more accomplished candidates apply in R1, not the fact that chances are better.
- We know what the we want the class to look like. If you are not a good fit in R1, the best we will do is waitlist you. At that point you are competing against R2 anyway.
- R1 can be harder because the adcomm may take a "let's wait and see what comes in R2 attitude"
- R1 sometimes has more competition so can be more challenging

My interpretation:
1) There is no evidence that R1 is better than R2
2) There is clear evidence that a strong application is better than a rushed one
3) Apply only when you are ready! Period.

_________________
Interested in a free 30 minute consultation with the Stacy Blackman Team? Sign up here: https://stacyblackman.com/contact
S T A C Y B L A C K M A N Consulting
323.934.3936
www.StacyBlackman.com

aim-wsc Legendary Member
Joined
20 Apr 2006
Posted:
2470 messages
Followed by:
14 members
85
Target GMAT Score:
801-
Mon Sep 11, 2006 1:52 am
Thats an eye opener i must say.

Thanks.

Would you throw some light on scholarship issue.
I learned that when it comes to scholarship and financial aid the early the better.

_________________
Getting started @BTG?

Please do not PM me, (not active anymore) contact Eric.

### GMAT/MBA Expert

Joined
26 Apr 2006
Posted:
1049 messages
Followed by:
113 members
50
Mon Sep 11, 2006 10:10 pm
Certainly early cannot hurt when it comes to scholarships. Some schools have specific deadlines for aid and certain scholarships and programs. Guidelines would differ school by school, and it may be best to call your target schools and ask them. Submitting when is best for you is still the overall rule of thumb.

_________________
Interested in a free 30 minute consultation with the Stacy Blackman Team? Sign up here: https://stacyblackman.com/contact
S T A C Y B L A C K M A N Consulting
323.934.3936
www.StacyBlackman.com

rajesh_ctm Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
27 Feb 2007
Posted:
135 messages
2
Sun Apr 01, 2007 6:04 pm
I had visited Chicago GSB for an information session, and I heard a surprising thing from an admissions staff. She said R1 is slightly more competitive, because they receive the best prepared applications in that round.

### GMAT/MBA Expert

Joined
13 Feb 2006
Posted:
6722 messages
Followed by:
967 members
1249
Sun Apr 01, 2007 6:49 pm
rajesh_ctm wrote:
I had visited Chicago GSB for an information session, and I heard a surprising thing from an admissions staff. She said R1 is slightly more competitive, because they receive the best prepared applications in that round.
Hm...that is interesting--but I would think that this admissions person wouldn't say that you have a better chance of getting admitted if you apply during Round 2.

_________________
Beat The GMAT | The MBA Social Network
Community Management Team

rajesh_ctm Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
27 Feb 2007
Posted:
135 messages
2
Sun Apr 01, 2007 7:32 pm
beatthegmat wrote:
Hm...that is interesting--but I would think that this admissions person wouldn't say that you have a better chance of getting admitted if you apply during Round 2.
No, she didn't say that. In fact that comment was in response to a question whether there is a disadvantage in applying in R2. She probably just wanted to encourage people to apply and not to think too much about R1 vs. R2 etc.

aim-wsc Legendary Member
Joined
20 Apr 2006
Posted:
2470 messages
Followed by:
14 members
85
Target GMAT Score:
801-
Sun Apr 01, 2007 7:55 pm
The exceptions are, I think the schools with ''early decision rounds or rolling admissions'' schools such as Columbia; the early you apply better your chances would be.
but again all applications will be treated in same way in their traditional rounds, I think.

_________________
Getting started @BTG?

Please do not PM me, (not active anymore) contact Eric.

Nisha1218 Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Joined
01 May 2007
Posted:
91 messages
Thu May 10, 2007 11:33 am
What about if you apply in round 3????

### GMAT/MBA Expert

Joined
26 Apr 2006
Posted:
1049 messages
Followed by:
113 members
50
Thu May 10, 2007 11:39 am
You are generally at a disadvantage applying in R3.

_________________
Interested in a free 30 minute consultation with the Stacy Blackman Team? Sign up here: https://stacyblackman.com/contact
S T A C Y B L A C K M A N Consulting
323.934.3936
www.StacyBlackman.com

MMC Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Joined
10 Sep 2007
Posted:
6 messages
1
Sun Sep 23, 2007 12:40 pm
Hi Stacey,

Thank you so much for this post, it is something that I have been wondering myself. I was hoping, however, that you could clarify the statement about the R1 applicants.

The statement was (not made by you) that R1 was more competitive because the "better prepared" applications are submitted then. What exactly does that mean? Does that mean that R2 applicants are not as strong or that their applications aren't prepared as well?

Also, at a school such as University of Michigan (on some lists a top ten school) would the statement that there is no better chance of getting in by submitting in R1 than R2 still hold true?

I prefer U of M since I am close and have close family that are alumni, so I know that campus well. It's a great school, with excellent networking. Also, I feel it is a school that will match opportunity cost with better possibilities later. If my GMAT score is high enough, I will be in the middle of the average of their current class profile.

Right now, as you may or may not know, Michigan is a state with very low unemployment. I hear over and over again that when the economy is not doing well that people tend to go back to school. What is your opinion of R1 competitiveness and higher levels of applicants vs. R2 with this information in mind?

_________________
Past performance is not indicative of future success!

MMC Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Joined
10 Sep 2007
Posted:
6 messages
1
Sun Sep 23, 2007 12:40 pm
Hi Stacey,

Thank you so much for this post, it is something that I have been wondering myself. I was hoping, however, that you could clarify the statement about the R1 applicants.

The statement was (not made by you) that R1 was more competitive because the "better prepared" applications are submitted then. What exactly does that mean? Does that mean that R2 applicants are not as strong or that their applications aren't prepared as well?

Also, at a school such as University of Michigan (on some lists a top ten school) would the statement that there is no better chance of getting in by submitting in R1 than R2 still hold true?

I prefer U of M since I am close and have close family that are alumni, so I know that campus well. It's a great school, with excellent networking. Also, I feel it is a school that will match opportunity cost with better possibilities later. If my GMAT score is high enough, I will be in the middle of the average of their current class profile.

Right now, as you may or may not know, Michigan is a state with very low unemployment. I hear over and over again that when the economy is not doing well that people tend to go back to school. What is your opinion of R1 competitiveness and higher levels of applicants vs. R2 with this information in mind?

_________________
Past performance is not indicative of future success!

prasath Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Joined
25 Apr 2007
Posted:
9 messages
Wed Dec 19, 2007 9:52 pm
Hi,
Im a bit late to give my GMAT and this will make me apply for R3 application.
Will i be at a disadvantage??

sonibubu Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Joined
21 Sep 2007
Posted:
21 messages
Test Date:
March 7, 2008
Target GMAT Score:
750
Fri Dec 28, 2007 11:08 am
I have read in a few places that MIT Sloan is the one school where applying in R1 has a clear advantage over applying in R2.

iandavis Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Joined
07 Jan 2008
Posted:
2 messages
Test Date:
1/7/2008
Target GMAT Score:
700
Thu Jan 10, 2008 9:50 am
Thanks for the Post Stacy its great.

What if I apply and then I'm not excepted. What happens next year, reapply with better scores or have I missed my chance?

aim-wsc Legendary Member
Joined
20 Apr 2006
Posted:
2470 messages
Followed by:
14 members
85
Target GMAT Score:
801-
Thu Jan 10, 2008 10:54 am
sonibubu wrote:
I have read in a few places that MIT Sloan is the one school where applying in R1 has a clear advantage over applying in R2.
Where did you read it? Is it from the official source (MIT Sloan website?)?

_________________
Getting started @BTG?

Please do not PM me, (not active anymore) contact Eric.

### Top First Responders*

1 GMATGuruNY 67 first replies
2 Rich.C@EMPOWERgma... 44 first replies
3 Brent@GMATPrepNow 40 first replies
4 Jay@ManhattanReview 25 first replies
5 Terry@ThePrinceto... 10 first replies
* Only counts replies to topics started in last 30 days
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members

### Most Active Experts

1 GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

132 posts
2 Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

EMPOWERgmat

112 posts
3 Jeff@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

95 posts
4 Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

92 posts
5 Max@Math Revolution

Math Revolution

91 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts