BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Role of Seat Belts in Injuries of Car Accident

Expert replies
by amirhakimi » Tue Dec 03, 2013 7:40 am
A recent survey of all auto accident victims in Dole County found that, of the severely injured drivers and front"seat passengers, 80 percent were not wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents. This indicates that, by wearing seat belts, drivers and front"seat passengers can greatly reduce their risk of being severely injured if they are in an auto accident.

The conclusion above is not properly drawn unless which of the following is true?

A. Of all the drivers and front"seat passengers in the survey, more than 20 percent were wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents.
B. Considerably more than 20 percent of drivers and front"seat passengers in Dole County always wear seat belts when travelling by car.
C. More drivers and front"seat passengers in the survey than rear"seat passengers were very severely injured.
D. More than half of the drivers and front"seat passengers in the survey were not wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents.
E. Most of the auto accidents reported to police in Dole County do not involve any serious injury.

Answer is A
Sincerely,
Amir,

The only place that "Success" comes before "Trying" is in the dictionary!
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Abhishek009 » Tue Dec 03, 2013 9:14 am
amirhakimi wrote: A recent survey of all auto accident victims in Dole County found that, of the severely injured drivers and front"seat passengers, 80 percent were not wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents. This indicates that, by wearing seat belts, drivers and front"seat passengers can greatly reduce their risk of being severely injured if they are in an auto accident.
There were 100 Accidents

80 Were not wearing seatbelts or 20 were wearing the seatbelts , it can also be such that 20 didn't have seatbelts installed in their cars.

The red highlighted part marked above takes into consideration that -

They had Seatbelts installed in their car & they wore seatbelts.

The conclusion above is not properly drawn unless which of the following is true?

This question insists finding the correct assumption among the answer choices presented before us.

A. Of all the drivers and front"seat passengers in the survey, more than 20 percent were wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents.

True - 20% were wearing seatbelts.

B. Considerably more than 20 percent of drivers and front"seat passengers in Dole County always wear seat belts when travelling by car.

May be true , we don't have sufficient data to claim the same.

C. More drivers and front"seat passengers in the survey than rear"seat passengers were very severely injured.

The survey doesn't mention the same - Out of scope.

The survey is done - of the severely injured drivers and front"seat passengers

" Back seat passengers " is out of scope.

D. More than half of the drivers and front"seat passengers in the survey were not wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents.

True the passage tells - " 80 percent were not wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents. "

E. Most of the auto accidents reported to police in Dole County do not involve any serious injury.

False - " .....of all auto accident victims in Dole County found that, of the severely injured drivers and front"seat passengers....... "


So we have 2 answer choices -

(A) Of all the drivers and front"seat passengers in the survey, more than 20 percent were wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents.

This seems better than option (D)

(D) More than half of the drivers and front"seat passengers in the survey were not wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents. - This is explicitly stated in the passage , hence this can't be the assumption.
Abhishek
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Wed Dec 04, 2013 12:42 am
Hi amirhakimi,

This CR question is based on a small, yet very important, detail that you need to spot to get the correct answer.

We're told about a survey of ALL auto accident victims. Of the ones who were SEVERELY INJURED (drivers and front-seat passengers), 80% were NOT wearing seat belts. This data tells us that there were TWO types of victims: those who were severely injured AND those who were NOT severely injured.

The conclusion of the prompt (wearing seat belts can greatly reduce the risk of drivers and front-seat passengers getting injured) really has no evidence to back it up. One of the answers MUST provide that evidence. We're given data about people who DON'T wear seat belts. To prove the point, we need data about people who DO wear seat belts.

Since the prompt references ALL auto accident victims, we need to think about those who were NOT severely injured. For the author's conclusion to be true, we need to assume that those who were NOT severely injured were most likely wearing their seat belts. That makes answer A the logical missing piece of info.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion