BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

rn't sure about the ans

Expert replies
by rahul_tgsp » Mon May 24, 2010 5:37 am
Ronald: According to my analysis of the national economy, housing prices should not increase during the next six months unless interest rates drop significantly.
Mark: I disagree. One year ago, when interest rates last fell significantly, housing prices did not increase at all.
It can be inferred from the conversation above that Mark has interpreted Ronald's statement to mean that
(A) housing prices will rise only if interest rates fall
(B) if interest rates fall, housing prices must rise
(C) interest rates and housing prices tend to rise and fall together
(D) interest rates are the only significant economic factor affecting housing prices
(E) interest rates are likely to fall significantly in the next six months

the problem is frm 1000 CR.... can someone explain the ans
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by grockit_andrea » Mon May 24, 2010 6:46 am
rahul_tgsp wrote:Ronald: According to my analysis of the national economy, housing prices should not increase during the next six months unless interest rates drop significantly.
Mark: I disagree. One year ago, when interest rates last fell significantly, housing prices did not increase at all.
It can be inferred from the conversation above that Mark has interpreted Ronald's statement to mean that
(A) housing prices will rise only if interest rates fall
(B) if interest rates fall, housing prices must rise
(C) interest rates and housing prices tend to rise and fall together
(D) interest rates are the only significant economic factor affecting housing prices
(E) interest rates are likely to fall significantly in the next six months

the problem is frm 1000 CR.... can someone explain the ans
I would say the answer here is B. Mark's statement begins with "I disagree," and then the next sentence presents his evidence, which is essentially that it's possible for interest rates to fall without housing prices to increase, since that happened a year ago. In order for that evidence to be supporting his disagreement, he must believe that Ronald meant "if interest rates fall => housing prices rise," when what Ronald actually said was "if interest rates don't fall => housing prices won't rise." Mark's response is based on faulty logic, and B explains exactly what that logic is.
Andrea A.
Grockit Tutor
https://www.grockit.com
Join the discussion

by paes » Tue May 25, 2010 2:44 am
B can't be the answer.

B : if interest rates fall, housing prices must rise
Mark : when interest rates last fell significantly, housing prices did not increase at all.

contradictory statements.

Other choices are also not convincing.
Join the discussion

by grockit_andrea » Tue May 25, 2010 3:14 am
The question asks what Mark has interpreted Ronald's statement to mean, and Mark's response to Ronald begins with "I disagree." Therefore, it makes sense that Mark would have interpreted Ronald's statement to mean something contradictory to Mark's own evidence.
Andrea A.
Grockit Tutor
https://www.grockit.com
Join the discussion

by rahul_tgsp » Tue May 25, 2010 7:48 am
thanks that was really helpful...
Join the discussion

by Stacey Koprince » Tue May 25, 2010 9:08 am
Received a PM asking me to respond. I agree with Andrea; I'd pick B.

R: housing prices should not increase BUT (they could? they will?) increase if interest rates drop significantly.

Note the stuff that I put in parentheses. In this case, the verb we should pick is "could" not "will," because R uses the verb "should" in the first half of the sentence. In other words, R doesn't actually say that prices WILL increase if interest rates drop significantly. He only specified that prices could increase IF interest rates drop.

M disagrees on the basis that, in the past, interest rates fell significantly but housing prices did NOT increase. (That doesn't actually contradict what R said though!) But it would contradict an interpretation in which R said that prices WILL increase if rates drop. If M thinks that's what R said, then his disagreement makes sense. (And that is reflected in answer B.)
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me
Join the discussion

by paes » Tue May 25, 2010 8:29 pm
grockit_andrea wrote:The question asks what Mark has interpreted Ronald's statement to mean, and Mark's response to Ronald begins with "I disagree." Therefore, it makes sense that Mark would have interpreted Ronald's statement to mean something contradictory to Mark's own evidence.
thanks Andrea
It makes sense now. I interpreted the meaning wrongly.
Join the discussion