Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

rented car

Expert replies
by LevelOne » Mon Jun 22, 2009 12:42 pm
Three friends rented a car for a week and divided the cost equally. What was the total cost of renting the car?

(1) if the three friends had kept the car for a second week, they could have obtained the two-week rate, which was 1.5 times the cost of one-week rental.
(2) if a fourth friend had joined the three friends and the cost had been divided equally among the four friends, the cost to each of the original three would have been reduced by $15.

(1) does not arise any questions to me; (2) would the equation look like:

x + (x-15) + (x-15) + (x-15)=100

?? thanks
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by abhinav85 » Mon Jun 22, 2009 12:47 pm
IMO B

What is the OA???
Join the discussion

by LevelOne » Mon Jun 22, 2009 12:50 pm
OA is B. What are your thoughts on the equation in (2)?
Join the discussion

Re: rented car

by PussInBoots » Mon Jun 22, 2009 12:52 pm
LevelOne wrote:Three friends rented a car for a week and divided the cost equally. What was the total cost of renting the car?

(1) if the three friends had kept the car for a second week, they could have obtained the two-week rate, which was 1.5 times the cost of one-week rental.
Definitely not sufficient enough by itself
LevelOne wrote:(2) if a fourth friend had joined the three friends and the cost had been divided equally among the four friends, the cost to each of the original three would have been reduced by $15.
x - how much three friends paid. Total cost = 3*x
after their friend joined, three friends paid x-15. Total cost = 4 *(x-15)
3x = 4x - 60 => x=60. Total cost = 180
So (A), (C) and (E) are wrong answers. Since (1) is not sufficient enough, (D) is wrong too.

The answer is (B)
Join the discussion

by LevelOne » Mon Jun 22, 2009 1:04 pm
it says 'the cost to each of the original three would have been reduced by $15.

you say: Total cost = 4 *(x-15). it looks like you are reducing the cost of the 4th one by 15 as well. pls explain.
Join the discussion

by rahulg83 » Mon Jun 22, 2009 1:36 pm
Hi

If x is the total cost of renting, then it will cost x/3 too each of the three friends. But if fourth person joins them, each will have to expend x/4
now x/3-x/4 = 15
=> x= 12*15 = 180
therefore statement 2 is sufficient..B
Join the discussion

by LevelOne » Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:25 pm
thanks, guys
Join the discussion