BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

remainder data sufficiency question

Expert replies
by alsergi » Tue Sep 23, 2008 3:48 am
Please, could you help me with this question?


If n is the sum of three consecutive nonnegative integers p, s and t,
with p<s<t, and n is also the product of three consecutive nonnegative integers
x, y and z, with x<y<z

What is the remainder when n is divided by 5?

1. The remainder when p is divided by 5 is 1
2. The remainder when x is divided by 5 is 1


Thanks in advance
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by siddarth » Tue Sep 23, 2008 4:43 am
The Answer is D, the remainder will be 1 in both cases. Try using numbers like 6+7+8 or 6*7*8, 11+12+13 or 11*12*13. Since we know that p & x are the smallest.
Join the discussion

by mals24 » Tue Sep 23, 2008 4:50 am
@ siddarth

I don't think you can use 6,7,8 or 11,12,13 because the question says

p+q+r=n
xyz=n

6+7+8=21
But 6*7*8=336

I guess the only set of numbers that work is 1,2,3 for both pqr and xyz.

1+2+3=6
1*2*3=6

But the answer is still D
Join the discussion

by siddarth » Tue Sep 23, 2008 5:09 am
As usual i got excited, thanks so much for correcting. This will be my biggest drawback, got to really work on this .
mals24 wrote:@ siddarth

I don't think you can use 6,7,8 or 11,12,13 because the question says

p+q+r=n
xyz=n

6+7+8=21
But 6*7*8=336

I guess the only set of numbers that work is 1,2,3 for both pqr and xyz.

1+2+3=6
1*2*3=6

But the answer is still D
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Tue Sep 23, 2008 5:55 am
mals24 wrote:
I guess the only set of numbers that work is 1,2,3 for both pqr and xyz.

1+2+3=6
1*2*3=6

But the answer is still D
The answer is D, but you've misunderstood the question. n is equal to the product of three consecutive integers (x, y and z), and is also equal to the sum of three consecutive integers (p, s and t), but there is no reason to think that x, y and z are the same numbers as p, s and t. It could be, for example, that n = 24, which is the product of three consecutive numbers (2*3*4 = 24) and the sum of three consecutive numbers (7+8+9 = 24).

Statement 1: We know that n = p + s + t, but we also know that p, s and t are increasing consecutive numbers. So s = p+1, and t = p+2, and n = 3p + 3. If the remainder is 1 when p is divided by 5, that means p is one greater than some multiple of 5:

p = 5k + 1

So n = 3p + 3 = 3(5k+1) + 3 = 15k + 6 = 5(3k + 1) + 1, and n is one greater than a multiple of 5. So the remainder will be 1; the statement is sufficient.

Statement 2: As above, x = 5k + 1 for some k, and y = 5k+2, z = 5k+3 because x, y and z are consecutive. Thus

n = (5k+1)(5k+2)(5k+3)

and if you were to multiply this out, every term will be a multiple of 5 except the last- 1*2*3 = 6. So the number is six larger than some multiple of 5, and again the remainder must be 1 when n is divided by 5.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by mals24 » Tue Sep 23, 2008 6:05 am
@ Ian

I have a small doubt the statements say that p and x when divided by 5 have a remainder of 1. But when you divide 2 and 7 by 5 the remainder is 2 not 1. That's why i chose 1,2,3 because they seemed to satisfy all the conditions. Did I misread something???
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Tue Sep 23, 2008 8:55 am
mals24 wrote:@ Ian

I have a small doubt the statements say that p and x when divided by 5 have a remainder of 1. But when you divide 2 and 7 by 5 the remainder is 2 not 1. That's why i chose 1,2,3 because they seemed to satisfy all the conditions. Did I misread something???
When I gave the example of 2*3*4 = 7+8+9 = 24, I wasn't using the statements, just so I could give an example with small numbers. The smallest positive numbers we can use besides 1, 2 and 3, if we want both statements to be true, are:

6*7*8 = 111+112+113 = 336

That is, 336 can be written as the product of three consecutive integers, and also as the sum of three consecutive integers, in each case beginning with an integer which gives a remainder of 1 when divided by 5. You can also make larger examples using 11*12*13, or 16*17*18, and so on.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by mals24 » Tue Sep 23, 2008 9:07 am
Finally I got the logic
Thanks a ton Ian for making the concept clear :)
Join the discussion

by alsergi » Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:56 am
Yes, the answer is D, thank you all !! You totally Rock :mrgreen:
Join the discussion