BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Remainder and 1

Expert replies
by rbansal » Fri May 13, 2011 12:44 pm
Can someone please help me with this,

I was listening to a GMAT PREP Lesson

And the question was

Is k+5/5 and integer?


Statement 1: When K is divided by 5, the remainder is 1?


Statement 1, was insufficient and they explained it by say 1 divided by 5 is equal to 0 with a remainder of 1.

Are there number property rules I am not understanding because 1/5 is .20

Thank you in Advance
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Fri May 13, 2011 1:37 pm
rbansal wrote:Can someone please help me with this,

I was listening to a GMAT PREP Lesson

And the question was

Is k+5/5 and integer?


Statement 1: When K is divided by 5, the remainder is 1?


Statement 1, was insufficient and they explained it by say 1 divided by 5 is equal to 0 with a remainder of 1.

Are there number property rules I am not understanding because 1/5 is .20

Thank you in Advance
Hi,

first thing to note is that if you've reproduced the question correctly, that statement is actually sufficient to answer the question.

Q: is (k+5)/5 an integer?

As with many DS questions, we can make our lives easier by simplifying the question. Let's break up the fraction:

Is k/5 + 5/5 an integer?

Is k/5 + 1 an integer?

Since 1 is already an integer, the question is simply:

Is k/5 an integer?

or

Is k a multiple of 5?

Now the statement:

(1) k/5 has a remainder of 1.

Well, if k/5 has a remainder of 1, then k cannot possibly be a multiple of 5 (if k were a multiple of 5, k/5 would have a remainder of 0 - that's the definition of a multiple!).

So, (1) gives us a definite "no" answer to the question and is sufficient alone.

Now on to your specific question:
Are there number property rules I am not understanding because 1/5 is .20
The short answer is "yes" - you need to brush up on the definition of "remainder".

When you divide one integer by another, one way to express the result is with a quotient and a remainder; the quotient is how many times the divisor goes in and the remainder is how much is left over after the division.

For example:

10/4 can be written as 2 rem 2, since 4 goes into 10 twice (taking up 8 of the 10) with 2 left over (10 minus the 8 that we used up).

27/6 can be written as 4 rem 3, since 6 goes into 27 four times (taking up 24 of the 27) with 3 left over (27 minus the 24 that we used up).

A GMAT trick to watch for is when you have a quotient of 0. For example:

2/7 can be written as 0 rem 2, since 7 goes into 2 zero times (taking up 0 of the 7) with 2 left over (2 minus the 0 that we used up).

So, when a question asks you for a remainder, don't do long division and end up with a decimal - instead, rewrite the fraction as a mixed fraction (and don't simplify!). The number on the numerator of the "left over" unsimplified fraction is the remainder.

Using the same examples as above:

10/4 = 2 2/4 = 2 rem 2
27/6 = 4 3/6 = 4 rem 3
2/7 = 2/7 = 0 rem 2
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by MAAJ » Fri May 13, 2011 2:37 pm
Things to remember:

Multiple of N +/- Multiple of N = Multiple of N -> Hence divisible by N

Non-Multiple of N +/- Multiple of N = Non-multiple of N -> Hence not divisible by N

**Non-Multiple of N +/- Non-Multiple of N = Could be or not a multiple of N -> Can't tell divisibility (** In this case N = 2 is an exception because ODD + ODD = EVEN -> which is divisible by 2)

Also you can Rephrase the question:
Is (k+5)/5 an Integer?
Is k/5 + 5/5 an Integer?
Is k/5 + 1 an Integer?
Is k/5 an Integer? NO! because when k is divided by 5, the remainder is 1
Statement 1 is sufficient
"There's a difference between interest and commitment. When you're interested in doing something, you do it only when circumstance permit. When you're committed to something, you accept no excuses, only results."
Join the discussion