BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 25
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 8 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Relative Costs

Expert replies
by imskpwr » Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:01 am
With adjustments for inflation, the relative cost of welfare benefits has been dropping since 1973, resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than in 1973.

resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than

resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement as

resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did

and as a result the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did

and the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less as a result to implement than
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Kasia@EconomistGMAT » Tue Jul 10, 2012 2:29 am
https://www.beatthegmat.com/sc-doubt-t115359.html#484565
Kasia@MasterGMAT wrote:The key issue in this question is PARALLELISM.
Answer a is incorrect since the two phrases compared are different parts of speech. Also it sounds as if "the welfare program" resulted from the drop in costs. The correct structure should be "the welfare program's now costing"
Answer b - incorrect. The wording is exactly the same but "than" was replaced with "as." However, the structure is still wrong.
Answer c also contains the same mistake although the part of the sentence following THAN was corrected.
"resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did [cost]"
Answer d is correct.
Answer e is incorrect since it compares a clause with a prepositional phrase.
Kasia
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT - the #1 rated GMAT course

"¢ If you found my post helpful, please click the "thank" button and/or follow me.

"¢ Take a 7 day free trial and find out why Economist GMAT is the highest rated GMAT course - https://gmat.economist.com/

"¢ Read GMAT Economist reviews - https://reviews.beatthegmat.com/economis ... mat-course
Join the discussion

by imskpwr » Tue Jul 10, 2012 7:14 am
although i choose C within 20 secs in the exam(timing problem), i still don't understand the problem with the first part structure that you have mentioned.

hope if you can elaborate that portion only.
Join the discussion

by mv12 » Tue Jul 10, 2012 10:52 am
D it is.
Join the discussion

by imskpwr » Tue Jul 10, 2012 11:37 pm
imskpwr wrote:although i choose C within 20 secs in the exam(timing problem), i still don't understand the problem with the first part structure that you have mentioned.

hope if you can elaborate that portion only.
Waiting for some expert to reply on this.
Join the discussion

by avik.ch » Wed Jul 11, 2012 10:02 pm
imskpwr wrote:
imskpwr wrote:although i choose C within 20 secs in the exam(timing problem), i still don't understand the problem with the first part structure that you have mentioned.

hope if you can elaborate that portion only.
Waiting for some expert to reply on this.
A,B and C can be directly eliminated based on "resulting in welfare programme".

When we write - "resulting in X" then it signifies that X is the outcome. Here welfare programme cannot be the outcome. Eliminate A,B and C.


Hope this helps !!
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Jul 12, 2012 6:59 am
imskpwr wrote:With adjustments for inflation, the relative cost of welfare benefits has been dropping since 1973, resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than in 1973.

resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than

resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement as

resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did

and as a result the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did

and the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less as a result to implement than

In A, B and C, resulting in the welfare program is incorrect. The welfare program was not the result. The result was its costing about 3 billion real dollars less. The correct construction would be resulting in the welfare program's costing about 3 billion real dollars less. (Please note that this construction would be grammatically sound but awkward and unlikely to be in the correct answer choice.) Eliminate A, B and C.

E incorrectly compares 3 billion dollars less to implement to in 1973. Eliminate E.

The correct answer is D.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Newbie_FastLearner » Sun Jul 15, 2012 11:51 pm
GMATGuruNY wrote:
imskpwr wrote:With adjustments for inflation, the relative cost of welfare benefits has been dropping since 1973, resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than in 1973.

resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than

resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement as

resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did

and as a result the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did

and the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less as a result to implement than

In A, B and C, resulting in the welfare program is incorrect. The welfare program was not the result. The result was its costing about 3 billion real dollars less. The correct construction would be resulting in the welfare program's costing about 3 billion real dollars less. (Please note that this construction would be grammatically sound but awkward and unlikely to be in the correct answer choice.) Eliminate A, B and C.

E incorrectly compares 3 billion dollars less to implement to in 1973. Eliminate E.

The correct answer is D.


Hi,
Comma+Verb+ing refers to the subject of the preceding clause. Here in Options A,B,C "resulting" refers to the subject of previous sentence ie,the relative cost. Since the relative cost in itself cant result into the welfare program, so the options A,B,C are incorrect. I used this strategy to eliminate the choice. Plz let me know if im correct.
Join the discussion