BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Recent observations suggest that small, earthlike worlds for

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Mon Nov 04, 2019 5:25 pm
Recent observations suggest that small, earthlike worlds form a very low percentage of the planets orbiting stars in the galaxy other than the sun. Of over two hundred planets that astronomers have detected around other stars, almost all are hundreds of times larger and heavier than the earth and orbit stars much smaller than the sun.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the above justification of the claim that earthlike worlds form a low percentage of the total number of planets?

A. There are millions of planets orbiting stars around which astronomers have not attempted to detect planets.

B. The best current astronomical theories predict that almost all planets around other stars are probably hundreds of times larger than the earth.

C. A planet orbiting a star similar to the sun would be more likely to be earthlike in size than would a planet orbiting a much smaller star.

D. The smaller a planet is relative to the star it orbits, the more difficult it is for astronomers to detect.

E. The observations would have detected any small, earthlike worlds orbiting the stars around which larger planets have been detected.

OA D

Source: Official Guide
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by deloitte247 » Sun Nov 10, 2019 1:50 pm
Premise: Recent observations suggest that small, earthlike worlds form a very low percentage of the planets orbiting stars in the galaxy other than the sun.
Conclusion: Of over two hundred planets that astronomers have detected around the stars, almost all are hundreds of times larger and heavier than the earth and orbit stars much smaller than the sun.

Option A - Incorrect:
We are only concerned about the planets that astronomers have detected, therefore, we do not know about the planets that astronomers are yet to detect.

Option B - Incorrect:
This option gives an example that strengthens the argument rather than weakens it because almost all planets around other stars are hundreds of times larger than the earth.

Option C - Incorrect:
This claim strengthens the argument in accordance with the passage.

Option D - Correct:
This option weakens the argument the most because we can't know from the passage if the smaller a planet is relative to the star it orbits, the more difficult it is for the astronomers to detect.
Therefore, this option is literally against the argument.

Option E - Incorrect:[/b
According to the passage, recent observations suggest small earlike worlds. Hence, the word "would have" impedes the flow of this option,
Join the discussion

reply

by [email protected] » Tue Nov 12, 2019 2:17 am
This prompt forces us to think outside the boundaries of earth <i class="em em-yum"></i>
JK

Conclusion is difficult to spot in this question, but if you read the prompt carefully it's not that hard then.
Here is the conclusion - "Of over two hundred planets that astronomers have detected around the stars, almost all are hundreds of times larger and heavier than the earth and orbit stars much smaller than the sun."

Which basically means that scientists haven't found any smaller earth like planets out of the 200 or more they have detected.

But what if smaller planets are harder to detect than larger planets?
Or what if our technology isn't so advanced that we can detect smaller planets.

Reasoning on the similar grounds will help us weaken the conclusion.

As you may see, option D will weaken it directly as its on the similar grounds of our reasoning.

It says that smaller planets are difficult to detect. Therefore, it becomes even harder for scientists to detect a smaller earth like planet.
Hence weakens the prompt that "none of the planets found were smaller like earth"
Join the discussion

by nitink » Wed Nov 13, 2019 10:48 am
Option A - Wrong
The argument is concerned about the planets that astronomers have detected. So, we are not concerned about the planets that astronomers are yet to detect.

Option D - Correct
If the astronomers have missed detecting the other smaller stars, then the conclusion is most probably wrong. hence this choice weakens the argument.
Join the discussion