Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Reasoning??

Expert replies
by adi_800 » Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:12 am
In Argonia the average rate drivers pay for car accident insurance is regulated to allow insurance companies to make a reasonable profit. Under the regulations, the rate any individual driver pays never
depends on the actual distance driven by that driver each year. Therefore, Argonians who drive less than average partially subsidize the insurance of those who drive more than average.

The conclusion above would be properly drawn if it were also true that in Argonia

(A) the average accident insurance rate for all drivers rises whenever a substantial number of new drivers buy insurance
(B) the average cost to insurance companies of insuring drivers who drive less than the annual average is less than the average cost
of insuring drivers who drive more than the annual average
(C) the lower the age of a driver, the higher the insurance rate paid by that driver
(D) insurance company profits would rise substantially if drivers were classified in terms of the actual number of miles they drive each year
(E) drivers who have caused insurance companies
to pay costly claims generally pay insurance rates that are equal to or lower than those paid by other drivers


Arrived at the answer by POE...but did not get d reasoning!!
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by ov25 » Sat Sep 18, 2010 7:19 am
imo B

here we need to justify the conclusion using the answer choice...

Premise 1: State regulates average rate the driver pays leaving reasonable margin for insurance company. This assumes rate is equal among all.

Premise 2: Driver who drives more distance on average pay rate/mile less than who drives more distance.

Concl: Therefore, Argonians who drive less than average partially subsidize the insurance of those who drive more than average.

Gap? The cost to insurance is less to support drivers who drive fewer miles on average. in other words, those who drive fewer miles do not end up in massively expensive accidents...
Join the discussion

by debmalya_dutta » Sat Sep 18, 2010 8:11 am
adi_800 wrote:In Argonia the average rate drivers pay for car accident insurance is regulated to allow insurance companies to make a reasonable profit. Under the regulations, the rate any individual driver pays never
depends on the actual distance driven by that driver each year. Therefore, Argonians who drive less than average partially subsidize the insurance of those who drive more than average.

The conclusion above would be properly drawn if it were also true that in Argonia

(A) the average accident insurance rate for all drivers rises whenever a substantial number of new drivers buy insurance
(B) the average cost to insurance companies of insuring drivers who drive less than the annual average is less than the average cost
of insuring drivers who drive more than the annual average
(C) the lower the age of a driver, the higher the insurance rate paid by that driver
(D) insurance company profits would rise substantially if drivers were classified in terms of the actual number of miles they drive each year
(E) drivers who have caused insurance companies
to pay costly claims generally pay insurance rates that are equal to or lower than those paid by other drivers


Arrived at the answer by POE...but did not get d reasoning!!
my pick is D
The conclusion here is - "Argonians who drive less than average partially subsidize the insurance of those who drive more than average"

And this is because the regulations are such that the annual average number of miles griven is not a factor in calculating the insurance premiums.

So , if it can be shown that in the hypothetical scenario, if the regulation were not to exist , then the insurance companies could have derived more more out of drivers who drive more that the national average.
@Deb
Join the discussion

by lokesh r » Sat Sep 18, 2010 1:10 pm
IMO b
Join the discussion

by JiuJitsuGuy » Sat Sep 18, 2010 2:14 pm
I would choose B because if you cost an insurance company less, the company could charge you a lower rate and still make the same amount of profit.

What is the OA?
Join the discussion

by adi_800 » Sat Sep 18, 2010 10:54 pm
Oa is B
@deb...the conclusion is about those who drive less pay for the insurance of those who drive more...
Now if the insurance comp. does not spend more on those who drive less then only people driving less are paying for the cost of those who drive more...

lets say those who drive less pay 100 bucks to insurance comp.
N those who drive more also pay 100 bucks...
But if insurance comp. spends 150 bucks on drivers driving less and only 50 bucks on drivers driving more...
then the conclusion dat people driving less pay for insurance of those driving more will be weakened..

Hence B is d assumption eliminating this alternate consideration...
Join the discussion

by debmalya_dutta » Sun Sep 19, 2010 7:59 am
adi_800 wrote:Oa is B
@deb...the conclusion is about those who drive less pay for the insurance of those who drive more...
Now if the insurance comp. does not spend more on those who drive less then only people driving less are paying for the cost of those who drive more...

lets say those who drive less pay 100 bucks to insurance comp.
N those who drive more also pay 100 bucks...
But if insurance comp. spends 150 bucks on drivers driving less and only 50 bucks on drivers driving more...
then the conclusion dat people driving less pay for insurance of those driving more will be weakened..

Hence B is d assumption eliminating this alternate consideration...
@Adi - Thanks ... I totally got it wrong...
@Deb
Join the discussion