BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

ration question - gmatprep

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Talkativetree » Thu Oct 22, 2009 8:43 pm
okay so the ratio of men to women is 5:2

(1) the ratio or children to men is 5:11
(2) the number of women<30

ratio problems are all about factors, common denominators and multiples. Looking at the ratio of men to women, 5:2, we know that for every 5 men, there are 2 women. another way to put it is that out of every 7 adults (men and women), 5 will be men and 2 will be women.

now (1) tells us that the ratio of C to M is 5:11. Now, because we can't have half of a child (that would look bad for the captain of the cruise ship), we need to find a nice whole number.

so our combined info for (1) are the two ratios

M:W = 5:2
C:M = 5:11

we can also write these in fraction terms as

m/w = 5/2

c/m = 5/11

what we want to do is find the LCD (lowest common denominator) between the men in each ratio. because 5 and 11 share no factors, then that means that their lowest common multiple (i am fuzzy on the terminology, so forgive me is I misspeak) will be 55, or 5x11.

so the next step is..

m/w = 5(11)/2(11) = 55/22
c/m = 5(5)/11(5) = 25/55

This means that the # of people = 55m + 22w + 25c

because we don't know what c,m, or w are,(1) is insufficient.

(2). we know that w<30
this by itself is insufficient, because there could be 20 women and 50 men, or 10 women and 25 men.

so we look at our equation, and see that there is only one value of w that would give us a # of w<30. so both together will be sufficient.
Join the discussion

i agree on the solution but....

by samrat chatterjee » Thu Oct 22, 2009 9:41 pm
As per the ques...

W:C=5:2

from 1-
c:m=5:11 clearly this alone cannot suffice

therefore we go further
w:m= (w:c)*(c:m)= (5:2)*(5:11)=25:22
that means if x=m+w

w=(25/47)x which means x=(47w)/25

and m= (22/47)x= (22/47)*(47w/25)=(22w/25)
for m to be an integer(no of men)w=multiples of 25

Now from 2
w<30 hence w=25 and m=22
Join the discussion

by Talkativetree » Fri Oct 23, 2009 4:14 am
ahh, i wrongly copied the problem down as M:W, my explanation is still sufficient in theory though...
Join the discussion