Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

ration question - gmatprep

Expert replies
by Montreal_Lady » Thu Oct 22, 2009 11:59 am
Hi,

I'm sooo bad with rations...can some one help with a detailed explanation?

thanks,
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Talkativetree » Thu Oct 22, 2009 8:43 pm
okay so the ratio of men to women is 5:2

(1) the ratio or children to men is 5:11
(2) the number of women<30

ratio problems are all about factors, common denominators and multiples. Looking at the ratio of men to women, 5:2, we know that for every 5 men, there are 2 women. another way to put it is that out of every 7 adults (men and women), 5 will be men and 2 will be women.

now (1) tells us that the ratio of C to M is 5:11. Now, because we can't have half of a child (that would look bad for the captain of the cruise ship), we need to find a nice whole number.

so our combined info for (1) are the two ratios

M:W = 5:2
C:M = 5:11

we can also write these in fraction terms as

m/w = 5/2

c/m = 5/11

what we want to do is find the LCD (lowest common denominator) between the men in each ratio. because 5 and 11 share no factors, then that means that their lowest common multiple (i am fuzzy on the terminology, so forgive me is I misspeak) will be 55, or 5x11.

so the next step is..

m/w = 5(11)/2(11) = 55/22
c/m = 5(5)/11(5) = 25/55

This means that the # of people = 55m + 22w + 25c

because we don't know what c,m, or w are,(1) is insufficient.

(2). we know that w<30
this by itself is insufficient, because there could be 20 women and 50 men, or 10 women and 25 men.

so we look at our equation, and see that there is only one value of w that would give us a # of w<30. so both together will be sufficient.
Join the discussion

i agree on the solution but....

by samrat chatterjee » Thu Oct 22, 2009 9:41 pm
As per the ques...

W:C=5:2

from 1-
c:m=5:11 clearly this alone cannot suffice

therefore we go further
w:m= (w:c)*(c:m)= (5:2)*(5:11)=25:22
that means if x=m+w

w=(25/47)x which means x=(47w)/25

and m= (22/47)x= (22/47)*(47w/25)=(22w/25)
for m to be an integer(no of men)w=multiples of 25

Now from 2
w<30 hence w=25 and m=22
Join the discussion

by Talkativetree » Fri Oct 23, 2009 4:14 am
ahh, i wrongly copied the problem down as M:W, my explanation is still sufficient in theory though...
Join the discussion