BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

ration question - gmatprep

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Talkativetree » Thu Oct 22, 2009 8:43 pm
okay so the ratio of men to women is 5:2

(1) the ratio or children to men is 5:11
(2) the number of women<30

ratio problems are all about factors, common denominators and multiples. Looking at the ratio of men to women, 5:2, we know that for every 5 men, there are 2 women. another way to put it is that out of every 7 adults (men and women), 5 will be men and 2 will be women.

now (1) tells us that the ratio of C to M is 5:11. Now, because we can't have half of a child (that would look bad for the captain of the cruise ship), we need to find a nice whole number.

so our combined info for (1) are the two ratios

M:W = 5:2
C:M = 5:11

we can also write these in fraction terms as

m/w = 5/2

c/m = 5/11

what we want to do is find the LCD (lowest common denominator) between the men in each ratio. because 5 and 11 share no factors, then that means that their lowest common multiple (i am fuzzy on the terminology, so forgive me is I misspeak) will be 55, or 5x11.

so the next step is..

m/w = 5(11)/2(11) = 55/22
c/m = 5(5)/11(5) = 25/55

This means that the # of people = 55m + 22w + 25c

because we don't know what c,m, or w are,(1) is insufficient.

(2). we know that w<30
this by itself is insufficient, because there could be 20 women and 50 men, or 10 women and 25 men.

so we look at our equation, and see that there is only one value of w that would give us a # of w<30. so both together will be sufficient.
Join the discussion

i agree on the solution but....

by samrat chatterjee » Thu Oct 22, 2009 9:41 pm
As per the ques...

W:C=5:2

from 1-
c:m=5:11 clearly this alone cannot suffice

therefore we go further
w:m= (w:c)*(c:m)= (5:2)*(5:11)=25:22
that means if x=m+w

w=(25/47)x which means x=(47w)/25

and m= (22/47)x= (22/47)*(47w/25)=(22w/25)
for m to be an integer(no of men)w=multiples of 25

Now from 2
w<30 hence w=25 and m=22
Join the discussion

by Talkativetree » Fri Oct 23, 2009 4:14 am
ahh, i wrongly copied the problem down as M:W, my explanation is still sufficient in theory though...
Join the discussion