BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Ratio

Expert replies
by yellowho » Tue Mar 01, 2011 6:18 am
I think, we've all seen the accidentally doubling a portion of a mixture problem. Is there a way to do them without making up numbers?

Making one up:

Mixture X has A,B, and C. Recipe calls for 1/5 of A, 2/7 of B, and the remainder C. While mixing the portion of A is accidentally doubled. What percentage of the mixture is C?
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Tani » Tue Mar 01, 2011 2:11 pm
A = .20X
B = .29X (approx.)
C = .51X

Total = X

Double A you get

Total = 1.20X

percentage of C = .51X/1.20X approximately 42.5%
Tani Wolff
Join the discussion

by Night reader » Tue Mar 01, 2011 2:46 pm
in general two scenarios are possible: 1) keep the mixture amount unchanged 2) change the amount of mixture

strange, sometimes we eat with knife and fork - does it really matter how we eat and what we eat on GMAT :)
under 1)
apply smart number --> 35
A is 7, B is 5*2, C is 35-7-10
A becomes 14, C is 35-14-10
C/(A+B+C)=C/(35) or 11/35 (31%)

under 2)
apply smart number --> 35
A is 7, B is 5*2, C is 35-7-10
A becomes 14, C is 18 (still)
C/(A+A+B+C)=C/(35+7) or 18/52 (35%)
yellowho wrote:I think, we've all seen the accidentally doubling a portion of a mixture problem. Is there a way to do them without making up numbers?

Making one up:

Mixture X has A,B, and C. Recipe calls for 1/5 of A, 2/7 of B, and the remainder C. While mixing the portion of A is accidentally doubled. What percentage of the mixture is C?
My knowledge frontiers came to evolve the GMATPill's methods - the credited study means to boost the Verbal competence. I really like their videos, especially for RC, CR and SC. You do check their study methods at https://www.gmatpill.com
Join the discussion

by Night reader » Tue Mar 01, 2011 2:50 pm
just checked the solution is identical
Tani Wolff - Kaplan wrote:A = .20X
B = .29X (approx.)
C = .51X

Total = X

Double A you get

Total = 1.20X

percentage of C = .51X/1.20X approximately 42.5%
Last edited by Night reader on Tue Mar 01, 2011 3:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
My knowledge frontiers came to evolve the GMATPill's methods - the credited study means to boost the Verbal competence. I really like their videos, especially for RC, CR and SC. You do check their study methods at https://www.gmatpill.com
Join the discussion

by anshumishra » Tue Mar 01, 2011 3:14 pm
Night reader wrote:hi Tani, doubling A we can't get 1.20x since x is responsible for B and C too
doubling the percentage violates our A-B-C ratio of three numbers in x
Tani Wolff - Kaplan wrote:A = .20X
B = .29X (approx.)
C = .51X

Total = X

Double A you get

Total = 1.20X

percentage of C = .51X/1.20X approximately 42.5%
above it's already not .51X
@Night reader
Your second method is equivalent to Tani's method (change the amount of mixture).
Tani is right.
You made a typo here : C/(A+A+B+C)=C/(35+7) or 18/52 (35%)
Otherwise the answer matches as well.
Thanks
Anshu

(Every mistake is a lesson learned )
Join the discussion

by Night reader » Tue Mar 01, 2011 3:20 pm
really? ah such nuisance , appologies Tani
anshumishra wrote:
Night reader wrote:hi Tani, doubling A we can't get 1.20x since x is responsible for B and C too
doubling the percentage violates our A-B-C ratio of three numbers in x
Tani Wolff - Kaplan wrote:A = .20X
B = .29X (approx.)
C = .51X

Total = X

Double A you get

Total = 1.20X

percentage of C = .51X/1.20X approximately 42.5%
above it's already not .51X
@Night reader
Your second method is equivalent to Tani's method (change the amount of mixture).
Tani is right.
You made a typo here : C/(A+A+B+C)=C/(35+7) or 18/52 (35%)
Otherwise the answer matches as well.
My knowledge frontiers came to evolve the GMATPill's methods - the credited study means to boost the Verbal competence. I really like their videos, especially for RC, CR and SC. You do check their study methods at https://www.gmatpill.com
Join the discussion

by Tani » Tue Mar 01, 2011 5:51 pm
The point of the question is that A has been doubled in violation of the original proportions and you now have to calculate the new proportions. if you doubled everything the proportions wouldn't change.
Tani Wolff
Join the discussion