BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Ratio Question

Expert replies
by jfranco23 » Tue Feb 17, 2009 5:33 am
A department manager distributed a number of pens, pencils and pads among the staff in the department, with each staff member receiving x pens, y pencils and z pads. How many staff memers were in the department?

1. The number of pens, pencils and pads that each staff member received were in the ratio 2:3:4, respectively

2. The manager distributed a total of 18 pens, 27 pencils and 36 pads
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by scoobydooby » Tue Feb 17, 2009 6:06 am
B?

stmnt 1: each member recd in the ration of 2:3:4.
this could work for any number of members. no of members can be 1,2,..anything. not sufficient

stmnt 2: 18 pens: 27 pencils: 36 pads
each member received the same ratio of pens, pencils, pads.
reducing 18:27:36 by highest common factor: 9, we get the no of staff as 9.
(as a check the ratio when reduced to lowest terms gives 2:3:4, which is the ratio of items each member gets, also confirmed by stmnt 1 above. statements never contradict each other, so we must be good)
Join the discussion

by DanaJ » Tue Feb 17, 2009 6:09 am
I say E. Each stmt is insufficient by itself, since in the first case we do not know anything except a ratio and in the second stmt we do not know anything about the ratio of the items (you could very well have 3 staff members receiving 6 pens, 9 pencils and 12 pads or just one staff member receiving all of the goods).
Taken together, you get the same as above. You can't tell if it's just one guy who got everything or if it's three or if it;s 6 guys. I'd go with E.
Join the discussion

by scoobydooby » Tue Feb 17, 2009 6:20 am
agree with danaj
Join the discussion

by sanjay_dce » Tue Feb 17, 2009 10:17 am
DanaJ wrote:I say E. Each stmt is insufficient by itself, since in the first case we do not know anything except a ratio and in the second stmt we do not know anything about the ratio of the items (you could very well have 3 staff members receiving 6 pens, 9 pencils and 12 pads or just one staff member receiving all of the goods).
Taken together, you get the same as above. You can't tell if it's just one guy who got everything or if it's three or if it;s 6 guys. I'd go with E.
I would say C,
since the question stem says each staff member got x, y ,z articles it means each got x pencil , y eraser, z sharpner.
using both statement we can find out no of staff = 9 i guess OA would tell us the clear picture
Join the discussion

by davidrobinson » Tue Feb 17, 2009 12:14 pm
My vote is C as well.

If every person received x, y and z and we know the ratio and how many were given out in total, we can back into the headcount.
Join the discussion

Re: Ratio Question

by x2suresh » Tue Feb 17, 2009 1:03 pm
jfranco23 wrote:A department manager distributed a number of pens, pencils and pads among the staff in the department, with each staff member receiving x pens, y pencils and z pads. How many staff memers were in the department?

1. The number of pens, pencils and pads that each staff member received were in the ratio 2:3:4, respectively

2. The manager distributed a total of 18 pens, 27 pencils and 36 pads
agree with E

clearly each statment not sufficient

combined

2:3:4 -->
2K , 3K, 4k --> pencils , papers and pads distributed.

say p persons.

p= 2k/x
we don't know the value of x and k


2k= 18 --> k=9

P = 2*9/x --> x can be 3 or 9

P= 6 or 2

not suffcient

E
Join the discussion

by AJ2009 » Wed Feb 18, 2009 3:38 am
I go with E.
Join the discussion