BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

rate vic

Expert replies
by resilient » Sun May 11, 2008 11:57 am
Machine A can complete a certain job in x hours. Machine B can complete the same job in y hours. If A and B work together at their respective rates to complete the job, which of the following represents the fraction of the job that B will not have to complete because of A's help?


a. x - y/x + y


b. x/y – x


c. x + y/xy


d. y/x – y


e. y/x + y


qa is e

plugging in number and calculating away however, facing a bit of difficulty in translating what is actually being asked and finalizing the lest step.
Appetite for 700 and I scraped my plate!
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by VP_Tatiana » Sun May 11, 2008 1:22 pm
Ok, so we need to remember that work = rate*time. We can find out how much work a certain machine completed if we know its rate (given in the problem) and the time it worked. So, we need to figure out the time a machine will work when it works in tandem with another machine.

We calculate the time needed to do the job when both machines work together with the formula:

1/total time = (1/x) + (1/y).

How did I get that? Well suppose x takes 3 hours to do the job. It's rate would then be 1/3 of a job per hour. We can get the rate of two machines working together by summing their individual rates.

We solve for total time, and get xy/(y+x).

Now, we want to know the work that B didn't have to do because of A's help. To figure out the work A did, we take A's rate (1/x) and A's time working (xy/(y+x)), and multiply them together.

This gives us y/(y+x), which is E.

Let me know if you have questions,

Tatiana
Tatiana Becker | GMAT Instructor | Veritas Prep
Join the discussion

by California4jx » Sun Aug 17, 2008 3:22 pm
another explanation could be:

Rate of A = 1/x
Rate od B = 1/y

Work Together: 1/x + 1/y
= x+y / xy (completed in 1 hour)
= xy / x + y (total time it took to complete entire job)

job that B doesnt has to do because of A's help:
=> y - (work together)
=> y - xy / x+y
=> y (x+y ) - xy / x + y
=> y (square) / x + y ---------- (I)

original time B took = y -----------(II)

Fraction = job that B doesnt has to do / original time B took ----- (III)

=> plug values in (III) from (I) and (II)
=> y(square) / x + y * (1/y)

=> y / x + y -----> E
Join the discussion

by pepeprepa » Mon Aug 18, 2008 1:25 am
To answer you question concerning plugging in. Personally, I don't think it is a good method for work problem, often confusing and hard to apply.
Join the discussion

by California4jx » Mon Aug 18, 2008 5:05 am
the above solution is not plugging any values - read carefully.
Join the discussion

by pepeprepa » Mon Aug 18, 2008 6:10 am
Yep I know what you did is not plugging in, I was talking about what resilient tried to do.
Join the discussion

by pepeprepa » Mon Aug 18, 2008 6:28 am
Yep I know what you did is not plugging in, I was talking about what resilient tried to do.
Join the discussion