BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Rate DS Q from gmatprep

Expert replies
by xcise_science » Tue Nov 27, 2007 1:59 pm
Hi, can someone help me with this. I got it right, but now that I’m redoing it I’m getting conflicting results!

Here’s the question:

Did it take Pei more than 2hrs to walk a distance of 10miles along a certain trail (1 mile = 1.6km, rounded to the nearest tenth).

1)Pei walked this distance at an average rate of less than 6.4km/hr
2)On average, it took Pei more than 9minutes per km to walk this
distance

Question stem (translation): Is T>2hr? (or is Rate less than 5mph?)

stmt 1: 6.4km==4miles
==>walking 10miles at less than 4mph mean T will be greater than 2.5hr. (also to answer question, R is less than 5 mph & T is greater than 2)
sufficient



Stmt2: (I can’t seem to translate this the right way. Each answer I get doesn't give me the same result as stmt 1)

first I tried to convert 9min/km (9min= 3/20hr; 1 km = 5/8miles)
==> so rate > 6/25 m/hr (this is where I started to get confused….did I convert wrong?)
if I plugged this rate in, then T< 250/3hr, which is clearly NS. But the answer is D, so I must've miscalculated.






Thanks
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by syv11 » Tue Nov 27, 2007 3:15 pm
2h .... 10miles?
2h .... 16km?

a) Speed <6.4km/h
18/6.4=2.5h
T>2.5h

enough info to solve

b) >9min*16km = >144 min => >2.4h

enough info to solve

Correct answer: D
Join the discussion

by syv11 » Tue Nov 27, 2007 3:21 pm
If you want to calculate speed for b:

10 miles / [(9*16)/60] = 4.2 miles / hour; if you increase the 9min per km your speed gets even slower
Join the discussion