Raised Quant, Native English Speaker, Need to Raise Verbal

Expert replies

jazzcat4u: Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts; Posts: 97; Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 2:43 pm

by jazzcat4u » Tue Sep 16, 2008 11:29 am

Hi All -

After 3 months of intense math review, I have raised my quant score.

My average score my first month of study:
Q 24 (20%) / V 26 (43%) / 490 (40%)

My average score my second month of study:
Q 32 (35%) / V 32 (67%) / 530 (46%)

My average score to date
Q 42 (71%) / V 29 (53%) / 590 (68%)

As you can see, I raised my quant score, but for some reason my verbal hasn't improved. I am a native english speaker and since I sucked at math, my strategy was to raise my quant score bc I felt my undergrad work showed that I had strong verbal abilities. So I put 80% of my time into studying quant and 20% on verbal.

At this point, I think if I can get a balanced score in both quant and verbal (aiming for 70-80th percentile) I would be happy. I take the test in 2 weeks, so any advice to improve verbal in a short time frame would be extremely appreciated.

Also, across the board in verbal (RC, CR, SC) I am scoring btwn 50-60%, so I can't really identify which one is the weakest. However, if anyone has any feedback on which verbal area I can improve on fastest (yah i know, good luck with the shortcut)...lemme know

Like this post

Source: Beat The GMAT — GMAT Strategy | Tue Sep 16, 2008 11:29 am

Brett B: Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts; Posts: 9; Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 8:54 am

re:

by Brett B » Tue Sep 16, 2008 1:00 pm

care to share how you raised your quant scores so much?

for me, princeton review helped my verbal scores quite a bit. they help you dissect sentence correction problems which has greatly improved my V scores.

Like this post

jazzcat4u: Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts; Posts: 97; Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 2:43 pm

by jazzcat4u » Tue Sep 16, 2008 2:19 pm

I went through all my resources (Kaplan, MGMAT, OG) and from the table of contents of each book, I created an outline/checklist of areas that I needed to cover within quant - roughly 5 diff math topics with 20-25 subtopics each. The list provided me structure on how to study, but more importantly, I had a checklist to refer to (I'm a bit of a checklist freak)...

From there I studied everyday for 2-5 hours depending on my schedule. Once I was done doing a thorough review on a particular area I marked it off of my checklist.

All in all, probably commited about 20-30 hours a week for the last 3 months on quant and only 5-10 hours a week on verbal.

Now my focus is improving Verbal - here's a general idea of what's been my trouble spots:

RC - Science Passages - BORING - blah blah blah antigens, isotopes, tryptophan levels, blah blah blah, metamorphic fluids, oligoosaccharins, electrorecptors, who gives a flying f***...how does one go past the first paragraph without falling asleep - i have way too many "huh???" moments after reading these type of passages...and even when i take notes or employ kaplans "scope/topic approach" or mgmats "headline/bulletpoint approach" i end up with the longest notes and not much comprehension....

CR - Inference Questions - geez, these are driving me crazy...I mean come on, have i really been taking things too literally my whole life...wah wah wah...i can't seem to read between the lines...frustrating (eyes roll)

SC - OMG, where do i start...how many years have i been speaking english now? as a native i am at a loss...

Like this post

guvernment: Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts; Posts: 3; Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:56 am

by guvernment » Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:55 pm

jazzcat4u wrote:
Now my focus is improving Verbal - here's a general idea of what's been my trouble spots:

RC - Science Passages - BORING - blah blah blah antigens, isotopes, tryptophan levels, blah blah blah, metamorphic fluids, oligoosaccharins, electrorecptors, who gives a flying f***...how does one go past the first paragraph without falling asleep - i have way too many "huh???" moments after reading these type of passages...and even when i take notes or employ kaplans "scope/topic approach" or mgmats "headline/bulletpoint approach" i end up with the longest notes and not much comprehension....

i have exactly the same problem .. science passages
its still fine when i do it from og or kaplan ..but while giving the practice test .. all messed up and takes too much time

Like this post

brianhoberg: Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts; Posts: 25; Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 8:10 pm; Location: San Antonio, TX; Thanked: 3 times

by brianhoberg » Wed Sep 17, 2008 7:26 am

I would suggest getting a copy fo the Manhattan GMAT SC guide (the red book), you can get them used pretty cheap off of amazon. Princeton Review does an excellent job with reviewing Verbal and I would start there. You can get an older copy (2007, 2008) off amazon for pretty cheap as well and get an idea of where you stand with verbal then.

Like this post

Post new topic Post Reply

• Page 1 of 1

GMAT Course Reviews

560 reviews

1168 reviews

431 reviews

359 reviews

147 reviews

5/5

5 Star (560 Reviews)

"Target Test Prep is the closest to the official version of the GMAT exam, about 99% accuracy in terms of the quality and quantity of information. The course has excellently created singular sets of focused lessons and tests for every possible topic that one could come across in the official GMAT exam."

"The TTP course maximizes the efficiency of the time you spend studying. It will take time and effort but I could almost guarantee that if you complete the course exactly as it is laid out you will get an amazing score. They also have a very responsive team willing to help with any questions you might have."

"TTP has two things that I think no other test prep company offers: A teaching approach that reinforces understanding and an attitude that will give you the mental preparedness needed to succeed on the test. TTP gives you a deep understanding of the concept you need to know while teaching you how to think."

Write a Review