BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Rafael vs. Roger

Expert replies
by orel » Tue Mar 31, 2009 3:29 am
If, in a tennis tournament, a match reaches a fifth-set tiebreak, the lower-ranked player always loses the tiebreak (and, therefore, the match). If Rafael, the second-ranked player, wins a tournament by beating Roger, the top-ranked player, then the match must not have included a fifth-set tiebreak.

Which of the following arguments most closely mimics the reasoning used in the above argument?
a. If a woman with a family history of twins gets pregnant three times, she will have one set of twins. Jennifer, who falls into this category, had two sets of twins, so she must not have gotten pregnant exactly three times.
b. If a salesman sells more product than anyone else in a calendar year, then he will earn an all-expenses-paid vacation. Joe earned an all-expense-paid vacation, so he must have sold more product than anyone else for the year.
c. A newspaper can charge a 50% premium for ads if its circulation surpasses 100,000; if the circulation does not pass 100,000, therefore, the newspaper can't charge any kind of premium for ads.
d. If a student is in the top 10% of her class, she will earn a college scholarship. Anna is not in the top 10% of her class, so she will not earn a scholarship.
e. All of the players on a football team receive a cash bonus if the team wins the Super Bowl. If quarterback Tom Brady earned a cash bonus last year, he must have been a member of the winning Super Bowl team.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by moorthy76 » Tue Mar 31, 2009 3:35 am
Not Sure....is it B?
Best Regards,
Surya
Join the discussion

by deep » Tue Mar 31, 2009 3:48 am
IMO - D
Whts the official answer??
Join the discussion

Re: Rafael vs. Roger

by dtweah » Tue Mar 31, 2009 6:00 am
Feruza Matyakubova wrote:If, in a tennis tournament, a match reaches a fifth-set tiebreak, the lower-ranked player always loses the tiebreak (and, therefore, the match). If Rafael, the second-ranked player, wins a tournament by beating Roger, the top-ranked player, then the match must not have included a fifth-set tiebreak.

Which of the following arguments most closely mimics the reasoning used in the above argument?
a. If a woman with a family history of twins gets pregnant three times, she will have one set of twins. Jennifer, who falls into this category, had two sets of twins, so she must not have gotten pregnant exactly three times.
b. If a salesman sells more product than anyone else in a calendar year, then he will earn an all-expenses-paid vacation. Joe earned an all-expense-paid vacation, so he must have sold more product than anyone else for the year.
c. A newspaper can charge a 50% premium for ads if its circulation surpasses 100,000; if the circulation does not pass 100,000, therefore, the newspaper can't charge any kind of premium for ads.
d. If a student is in the top 10% of her class, she will earn a college scholarship. Anna is not in the top 10% of her class, so she will not earn a scholarship.
e. All of the players on a football team receive a cash bonus if the team wins the Super Bowl. If quarterback Tom Brady earned a cash bonus last year, he must have been a member of the winning Super Bowl team.
If, in a tennis tournament, a match reaches a fifth-set tiebreak, (A) the lower-ranked player always loses the tiebreak (B) (and, therefore, the match). If Rafael, the second-ranked player, wins a tournament by beating Roger, (Not B) the top-ranked player, then the match must not have included a fifth-set tiebreak. (Not A)

If A then B
Not B, therefore Not A

.If a woman with a family history of twins gets pregnant three times, (A) she will have one set of twins (B). Jennifer, who falls into this category, had two sets of twins, (Not B) so she must not have gotten pregnant exactly three times ( Not A)

Correct answer is A
Join the discussion

by James_83 » Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:05 am
Good explanation dtweah.

I choose B. What's OA?
Join the discussion

by delhiboy1979 » Tue Mar 31, 2009 9:02 pm
SHould be A.
Join the discussion

by ketkoag » Wed Apr 01, 2009 4:31 am
I feel too, its A..
OA??
Join the discussion

by yeloaw » Mon Apr 06, 2009 1:31 pm
I think the answer is A.

If A is true, then B is true. If B is false, then A must be false.

a. If a woman with a family history of twins gets pregnant three times, she will have one set of twins. Jennifer, who falls into this category, had two sets of twins, so she must not have gotten pregnant exactly three times.

A = woman with family history of twins gets pregnant 3x
B = have one set of twins

Follows same pattern as original

b. If a salesman sells more product than anyone else in a calendar year, then he will earn an all-expenses-paid vacation. Joe earned an all-expense-paid vacation, so he must have sold more product than anyone else for the year.

A = salesman sells more products than anyone else in a calendar year
B = earn all-expenses-paid vacation

This scenario shows
If A is true, then B is true
B is true therefore A must be true
Join the discussion

by Musicolo » Tue Apr 07, 2009 5:56 am
I think its A since all others are exectly the same. A is the only that sticks out.
Join the discussion

by vertigo05 » Tue Apr 07, 2009 8:52 am
one more vote for A.
OA pls.
Join the discussion

by rahulg83 » Tue Apr 14, 2009 12:27 am
Answer should be A..

argument says like this...If A -> then B
therefore if not B -> then not A

we have to fine answer which is similar to this analogy..n that's A
Join the discussion

Does this question have an answer

by mharv » Wed Apr 15, 2009 4:22 am
Feruza,

You are testing my powers of Causation and I am not getting far eliminating any of the answers. :o :o

Pregnant Lady vs. Salesman vs. Newspaper vs. Student vs. Sportsman

Please help.
Regards,
Arvind
Join the discussion

by krisraam » Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:31 am
It should be A.
Good Question and nice explanation.

Thanks
Raama
Join the discussion

by michigangradftw » Mon Jul 23, 2012 12:26 pm
D is the same. If A, B. Not A, so not B. Why not D?

EDIT - The logic is Not B -- > Not A
Join the discussion