BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Radioactive - Tougher problem

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 12:56 pm
Location: Midwest
Thanked: 1 times
by charlie33 » Sun Jul 05, 2009 9:53 am
The radioactive element americium has a half-life of 432 years. Suppose we start with a 20-g mass of americium.
How much will be left after 367 years?


A. 17.0 g
B. 11.1 g
C. 15.5 g
D. 8.8 g
E. 18.0 g
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Problem Solving |
Legendary Member
Posts: 527
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 12:06 am
Thanked: 7 times

Re: Radioactive - Tougher problem

by real2008 » Sun Jul 05, 2009 10:38 am
charlie33 wrote:The radioactive element americium has a half-life of 432 years. Suppose we start with a 20-g mass of americium.
How much will be left after 367 years?


A. 17.0 g
B. 11.1 g
C. 15.5 g
D. 8.8 g
E. 18.0 g
is the OA B? If so, I can explain....
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 12:56 pm
Location: Midwest
Thanked: 1 times

by charlie33 » Sun Jul 05, 2009 10:47 am
I don't know I am having trouble working it out, doesn't seem much like a GMAT style question.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 12:56 pm
Location: Midwest
Thanked: 1 times

by charlie33 » Sun Jul 05, 2009 10:50 am
I get A but I am not sure. I will have to find the answer book.

367/432 = approx .85
20*.85=17
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 527
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 12:06 am
Thanked: 7 times

by real2008 » Sun Jul 05, 2009 11:02 am
charlie33 wrote:I get A but I am not sure. I will have to find the answer book.

367/432 = approx .85
20*.85=17
I think it is 20/{2^(367/432)} i.e. 11.099

Can you tell me the source please?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 12:56 pm
Location: Midwest
Thanked: 1 times

by charlie33 » Sun Jul 05, 2009 11:04 am
Yes B is correct, I found the answer sheet.

It is from a class I took at my local university for the GMAT.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 472
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:54 pm
Thanked: 56 times

by ssmiles08 » Sun Jul 05, 2009 3:00 pm
Is there some sort of formula for these kind of problems? It would be nice to know some solid way of going about this.

I would have just approximated 11.1 as the answer b/c you know in 432 years, the radioactive element would be 10g.

367 years a little more than 80% of 432 years which means it would have decayed about 80% of its first half life. 80% of 10 = 8 so 20 - 8 ~ 12

would have guesstimated it around 11-12% which would be B in this case.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2623
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 amFollowed by: 355 members
Location: Montreal
Thanked: 1090 times
GMAT Score:780

by Ian Stewart » Sun Jul 05, 2009 3:51 pm
You'll never see a question like this on a real GMAT, first because you'd need to know what 'half-life' means, which is not something you're assumed to know on the GMAT (it's not a physics test), and second because the calculation is impossible without a calculator. Sure, you can tell from the answer choices which must be right, but if the GMAT were to design a question around this concept, they would not use numbers like 432 and 367 in the question; instead they'd use numbers that were manageable.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 527
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 12:06 am
Thanked: 7 times

by real2008 » Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:03 am
Ian Stewart wrote:You'll never see a question like this on a real GMAT, first because you'd need to know what 'half-life' means, which is not something you're assumed to know on the GMAT (it's not a physics test), and second because the calculation is impossible without a calculator. Sure, you can tell from the answer choices which must be right, but if the GMAT were to design a question around this concept, they would not use numbers like 432 and 367 in the question; instead they'd use numbers that were manageable.
Exactly.....
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1