BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 563 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Radio Advertising!

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Subscribe topic
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 407
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 9:19 amFollowed by: 7 members
Thanked: 25 times
by Ozlemg » Tue Jul 26, 2011 5:26 am
In Los Angeles, a political candidate who buys saturation radio advertising will get maximum name recognition.
The statement above logically conveys which of the following?

Radio advertising is the most important factor in political campaigns in Los Angeles.
Maximum name recognition in Los Angeles will help a candidate to win a higher percentage of votes cast in the city.
Saturation radio advertising reaches every demographically distinct sector of the voting population of Los Angeles.
For maximum name recognition a candidate need not spend on media channels other than radio advertising.
A candidate's record of achievement in the Los Angeles area will do little to affect his or her name recognition there.


why not [spoiler]B?[/spoiler]
The more you suffer before the test, the less you will do so in the test! :)
Top
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Legendary Member
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 amFollowed by: 53 members
Location: India
Thanked: 375 times

by Frankenstein » Tue Jul 26, 2011 5:37 am
Hi,
Is the answer D?
For B to be correct, you are assuming things which are not mentioned. The argument nowhere talks about the correlation between name recognition and percentage of votes.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Top
Join the discussion
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 165
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 9:44 pm
Thanked: 8 times

by sandy217 » Tue Jul 26, 2011 5:50 am
IMO D
B can ruled out based on the reasons stated above.
Top
Join the discussion
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 67
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:34 am
Location: india
Thanked: 1 times

by dinaroneo » Tue Jul 26, 2011 7:24 am
But why not C???
Top
Join the discussion
Legendary Member
Posts: 627
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:12 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 4 times

by mankey » Fri Nov 25, 2011 10:51 pm
Stuck with C and D. Please help.

Thanks.
Top
Join the discussion
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 385
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2011 9:02 pmFollowed by: 6 members
Thanked: 62 times

by user123321 » Sat Nov 26, 2011 5:58 am
mankey wrote:Stuck with C and D. Please help.

Thanks.
The question says a candidate will get maximum recognition through radio advertising. maximum doesn't mean it will cover 100% of the voters. But that is what C says, which is extreme. So C can be ruled out.

user123321
Just started my preparation :D
Want to do it right the first time.
Top
Join the discussion
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 119
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 9:42 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Location: Pune
Thanked: 1 times
GMAT Score:660

by 786 » Sat Nov 26, 2011 10:23 am
Maximum name recognition in Los Angeles will help a candidate to win a higher percentage of votes cast in the city.
the argument mentions nothing about votes . kick this out.
Saturation radio advertising reaches every demographically distinct sector of the voting population of Los Angeles.
The argument mentions nothing about demographically distinct sector or voting populations . Kick this out.
Top
Join the discussion
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1255
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 2:08 pmFollowed by: 90 members
Location: St. Louis
Thanked: 312 times

by Tani » Sat Nov 26, 2011 4:59 pm
The initial statement is very simple. It gives you one fact: radio advertising will do the job. Any answer that brings in other factors such as votes or demographics will be out of scope.
Tani Wolff
Top
Join the discussion
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 35
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 1:06 pm

by jaguar123 » Sun Nov 27, 2011 11:17 am
In D. How can we come to the conclusion - no other media channels are effective.
We are just that in Radio - the person with max ad - max recognition.

Please help
Top
Join the discussion
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 12:37 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 3 times

by sk8legend408 » Sun Nov 27, 2011 11:38 am
Hi jaguar123,
In Los Angeles, a political candidate who buys saturation radio advertising will get maximum name recognition.
The statement above logically conveys which of the following?

Radio advertising is the most important factor in political campaigns in Los Angeles.
Maximum name recognition in Los Angeles will help a candidate to win a higher percentage of votes cast in the city.
Saturation radio advertising reaches every demographically distinct sector of the voting population of Los Angeles.
For maximum name recognition a candidate need not spend on media channels other than radio advertising.
A candidate's record of achievement in the Los Angeles area will do little to affect his or her name recognition there.
The statement says that a candidate who advertises on the radio will get maximum name recognition. It is implying D, that for maximum name recognition a candidate does not need to spend on other media channels because the radio will have the maximum impact on name recognition.

Hope this helps.
Top
Join the discussion
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1255
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 2:08 pmFollowed by: 90 members
Location: St. Louis
Thanked: 312 times

by Tani » Sun Nov 27, 2011 2:49 pm
The answer does not say that no other media are effective. It simply confirms that radio alone is enough.
Tani Wolff
Top
Join the discussion
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 461
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 9:09 amFollowed by: 3 members
Location: pune
Thanked: 36 times

by amit2k9 » Sun Nov 27, 2011 10:52 pm
except D all other are either extrapolated or out of focus.
For Understanding Sustainability,Green Businesses and Social Entrepreneurship visit -https://aamthoughts.blocked/
(Featured Best Green Site Worldwide-https://bloggers.com/green/popular/page2)
Top
Join the discussion
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 296
Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 5:10 amFollowed by: 5 members
Location: Vietnam
Thanked: 10 times

by tuanquang269 » Sun Dec 11, 2011 9:46 am
Ozlemg wrote:In Los Angeles, a political candidate who buys saturation radio advertising will get maximum name recognition.
The statement above logically conveys which of the following?

Radio advertising is the most important factor in political campaigns in Los Angeles.
Maximum name recognition in Los Angeles will help a candidate to win a higher percentage of votes cast in the city.
Saturation radio advertising reaches every demographically distinct sector of the voting population of Los Angeles.
For maximum name recognition a candidate need not spend on media channels other than radio advertising.
A candidate's record of achievement in the Los Angeles area will do little to affect his or her name recognition there.


why not [spoiler]B?[/spoiler]
When the name recognition is maximum, using other means of advertising will be ineffective.
Top
Join the discussion
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1255
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 2:08 pmFollowed by: 90 members
Location: St. Louis
Thanked: 312 times

by Tani » Sun Dec 11, 2011 8:13 pm
The stimulus tells us radio alone is enough to get the highest possible name recognition. It does not tell us anything about votes. There will always be candidates with high name recognition who do not get the most votes. Name recognition simply means awareness, not liking or approval.
Tani Wolff
Top
Join the discussion