BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

race with 3 teams

Expert replies
by sairamGmat » Tue Jul 27, 2010 5:12 am
The participants in a race consisted of 3 teams with 3 runners on each team. A team was awarded 6 -n points if one of its runners finished in nth place, where 1 <= n <= 5. If all of the runners finished the race and if there were no ties, was each team awarded at least one point?
(1) No team was awarded more than a total of 6 points.
(2) No pair of teammates finished in consecutive places among the top five places


OA is A. Can any one say how it is OA?
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by nicolezl » Tue Jul 27, 2010 5:43 am
Let's see if I can explain this....

OK, let's call the teams A, B, and C.

(1) If one of the members of team A comes in first place, they get (6-1), or 5, points. The only other top 5 place they could come in is 5th, since no team can have more than 6 points.

Then if B comes in second, they get 4 points, so they can only come in 4th as well to get a total of 6 points.

A member of a team C must therefore come in 3rd, and each team gets at least one point.

Or another way to think about it: The most top 5 places a team can get is 3 (3rd, 4th, and 5th), which gives them 6 points. And since one of the other teams can't get first and second, they each get one of the top 2 places.

Suff.

(2) The top 5 in order could be, for example:

A, B, A, B, A (they don't each get at least one point, since C didn't make the top 5)
A, B, C, A, B (they each get at least one point)

Insuff.

So the answer is A
Join the discussion

by firatb » Wed Jul 28, 2010 11:52 am
sairamGmat wrote:The participants in a race consisted of 3 teams with 3 runners on each team. A team was awarded 6 -n points if one of its runners finished in nth place, where 1 <= n <= 5. If all of the runners finished the race and if there were no ties, was each team awarded at least one point?
(1) No team was awarded more than a total of 6 points.
(2) No pair of teammates finished in consecutive places among the top five places


OA is A. Can any one say how it is OA?
Statement 1: Total number of points to be delivered is 5*(5+1)/2=15
Since no team gets more than 6 points, Even the most unsuccessful team gets at least 3 points.

Sufficent

Statement 2: This is pretty obvious. There might be many different orders in which a particular team might or might not be in the top 5.
ex: A-B-A-B-A
B-A-B-A-B
A-B-A-C-B

Insufficient
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:01 pm
sairamGmat wrote:The participants in a race consisted of 3 teams with 3 runners on each team. A team was awarded 6 -n points if one of its runners finished in nth place, where 1 <= n <= 5. If all of the runners finished the race and if there were no ties, was each team awarded at least one point?
(1) No team was awarded more than a total of 6 points.
(2) No pair of teammates finished in consecutive places among the top five places


OA is A. Can any one say how it is OA?
1st place = 6-1 = 5 points
2nd place = 6-2 = 4 points
3rd place = 6-3 = 3 points
4th place = 6-4 = 2 points
5th place = 6-5 = 1 point
Total = 5+4+3+2+1 = 15 points.

Statement 1:
Max for 2 teams = 2*6=12.
So 3rd team must get 15 - 12= 3 points.
So every team gets at least 1 point. Sufficient.

Statement 2:
Team A could be 1st, 3rd, 5th
Team B could be 2nd, 4th.
Only 2 teams get at least one point.

Team A could be 1st, 3rd, 5th.
Team B could be 2nd.
Team C could be 4th.
All 3 teams get at least 1 point.

Insufficient.

The correct answer is A.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion